A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for tracking copper using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge

Abstract This paper compares the performance of five different supervised machine learning (SL) algorithms to identify the practical model for tracking copper using solution cathode glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (SCGD-OES). A total of 4500 SCGD-OES spectra were collected, corresponding to 15 different copper concentrations ranging from 10.3 mg l −1 to 59.6 mg l −1 , for training and validating five models: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), and recurrent neural network (RNN). Then, performance of these models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision of predictions and training time. In terms of accuracy, the relative error (RE) was 3% for the CNN model and 4% for the ANN model. Conversely, the RE increased from 21% and 43% for the RF and RNN models to 103% for the KNN model due to the unpredictability of Cu concentration outside the training range. Regarding precision, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values were similar across all models, with the lowest RSD being 3% for the CNN model and the highest being 5% for the RF model. The training time indicated that the KNN and RF models provided the best learning speed, while the CNN model had the slowest learning speed, taking 5 times longer than the ANN model. The accuracy of the ANN and CNN models is in agreement with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), with a average difference not exceeding 6% when tracking six different Cu concentrations, both inside and outside the training range. Additionally, this research investigated the weight distribution in the hidden layers of the ANN, CNN, and RNN models and feature importances in the RF model to enhance understanding of the internal structure of models and assist analysts in selecting the practical model for tracking heavy metals based on SCGD-OES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physica Scripta
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/addfb9
Primary Topic
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for tracking copper using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge

Nguyen Huynh Duy Khang, Nguyễn Thành Đạt, Kim Ngoc Pham
1 links
Physica Scripta
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
article

A comparative study of supervised machine learning algorithms for tracking copper using optical emission spectroscopy of solution cathode glow discharge

Nguyen Huynh Duy Khang, Nguyễn Thành Đạt, Kim Ngoc Pham
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper compares the performance of five different supervised machine learning (SL) algorithms to identify the practical model for tracking copper using solution cathode glow discharge optical emission spectroscopy (SCGD-OES). A total of 4500 SCGD-OES spectra were collected, corresponding to 15 different copper concentrations ranging from 10.3 mg l −1 to 59.6 mg l −1 , for training and validating five models: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), convolutional neural network (CNN), and recurrent neural network (RNN). Then, performance of these models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision of predictions and training time. In terms of accuracy, the relative error (RE) was 3% for the CNN model and 4% for the ANN model. Conversely, the RE increased from 21% and 43% for the RF and RNN models to 103% for the KNN model due to the unpredictability of Cu concentration outside the training range. Regarding precision, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values were similar across all models, with the lowest RSD being 3% for the CNN model and the highest being 5% for the RF model. The training time indicated that the KNN and RF models provided the best learning speed, while the CNN model had the slowest learning speed, taking 5 times longer than the ANN model. The accuracy of the ANN and CNN models is in agreement with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), with a average difference not exceeding 6% when tracking six different Cu concentrations, both inside and outside the training range. Additionally, this research investigated the weight distribution in the hidden layers of the ANN, CNN, and RNN models and feature importances in the RF model to enhance understanding of the internal structure of models and assist analysts in selecting the practical model for tracking heavy metals based on SCGD-OES.

Physica ScriptaVol. 100(7)
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.