Linguistic Aspects of Mythological Units in Uzbek and English Languages: Comparative Analysis

This research examines the linguistic features of mythological units in Uzbek and English languages, analyzing their structural, semantic, and functional characteristics from a comparative perspective.The study employs a corpus-based approach to identify and classify mythological lexical units in both languages, revealing significant patterns in their formation, usage, and cultural embedding.Results indicate that while English mythological units demonstrate greater polysemy and metaphorical extension into contemporary discourse, Uzbek mythological units retain stronger connections to traditional belief systems and oral literature.Both languages show distinct patterns in word-formation processes when creating mythological terminology, with Uzbek favoring affixation and compounding based on Turkic roots, while English draws heavily from Greek, Roman, and Germanic etymological sources.The functional analysis reveals that mythological units serve not only as cultural referents but also as productive sources for contemporary idioms, metaphors, and conceptual frameworks in both languages, though with differing degrees of semantic transformation.This comparative study contributes to the fields of cultural linguistics, lexicology, and mythological studies by providing insights into how linguistic structures encode and transmit mythological concepts across different language families.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36719/2789-6919/45/108-117
Primary Topic
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic Aspects of Mythological Units in Uzbek and English Languages: Comparative Analysis

Mumtozbegim Abduolimova
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
article

Linguistic Aspects of Mythological Units in Uzbek and English Languages: Comparative Analysis

Mumtozbegim Abduolimova
article en

Abstract

This research examines the linguistic features of mythological units in Uzbek and English languages, analyzing their structural, semantic, and functional characteristics from a comparative perspective.The study employs a corpus-based approach to identify and classify mythological lexical units in both languages, revealing significant patterns in their formation, usage, and cultural embedding.Results indicate that while English mythological units demonstrate greater polysemy and metaphorical extension into contemporary discourse, Uzbek mythological units retain stronger connections to traditional belief systems and oral literature.Both languages show distinct patterns in word-formation processes when creating mythological terminology, with Uzbek favoring affixation and compounding based on Turkic roots, while English draws heavily from Greek, Roman, and Germanic etymological sources.The functional analysis reveals that mythological units serve not only as cultural referents but also as productive sources for contemporary idioms, metaphors, and conceptual frameworks in both languages, though with differing degrees of semantic transformation.This comparative study contributes to the fields of cultural linguistics, lexicology, and mythological studies by providing insights into how linguistic structures encode and transmit mythological concepts across different language families.

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHVol. 5(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Education, Innovation and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.