‘The imagination is largely the child of the flesh’: Virginia Woolf’s Embodied Historicity

‘Memories of a Working Women’s Guild’ (1930, rev. 1931) stands apart in Virginia Woolf’s profuse essayistic production. Part political essay and personal reminiscing, part sociological reflection and meta-historical exploration, it should be read as one of Woolf’s most visionary experimentations in history writing. In that essay Woolf probes the experiential nature of history writing, the way identity formations and structures of domination are embodied and history is inscribed in the everyday. Such emphasis reminds us that Woolf’s experimental history writing was contemporary to key historiographical turns in 20th century history writing, from the pioneering work of economic historian Eileen Power, to the history of sensibility, or later micro-history. Woolf’s attention to embodied social identity and sustained reflexiveness also allows her to anticipate on later historiographical evolutions, in the works of the likes of Raphael Samuel or, more recently, Yvan Jablonka. Turning to the 1931 essay, as well as sections from her 1926 diary and A Room of One’s Own, the article highlights Woolf’s empiricist history writing and the way it grounds historical self-reflexiveness in the lived and experiential reality of political and cultural power structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Études britanniques contemporaines
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/141gq
Primary Topic
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The imagination is largely the child of the flesh’: Virginia Woolf’s Embodied Historicity

Catherine Bernard
Études britanniques contemporaines
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
article

‘The imagination is largely the child of the flesh’: Virginia Woolf’s Embodied Historicity

Catherine Bernard
article en

Abstract

‘Memories of a Working Women’s Guild’ (1930, rev. 1931) stands apart in Virginia Woolf’s profuse essayistic production. Part political essay and personal reminiscing, part sociological reflection and meta-historical exploration, it should be read as one of Woolf’s most visionary experimentations in history writing. In that essay Woolf probes the experiential nature of history writing, the way identity formations and structures of domination are embodied and history is inscribed in the everyday. Such emphasis reminds us that Woolf’s experimental history writing was contemporary to key historiographical turns in 20th century history writing, from the pioneering work of economic historian Eileen Power, to the history of sensibility, or later micro-history. Woolf’s attention to embodied social identity and sustained reflexiveness also allows her to anticipate on later historiographical evolutions, in the works of the likes of Raphael Samuel or, more recently, Yvan Jablonka. Turning to the 1931 essay, as well as sections from her 1926 diary and A Room of One’s Own, the article highlights Woolf’s empiricist history writing and the way it grounds historical self-reflexiveness in the lived and experiential reality of political and cultural power structures.

Études britanniques contemporainesVol. 68
Institute of Contemporary Art (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Institute for Employment Studies (GB), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.