What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy

Italy. Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales − from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones − to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives. The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales. • Evaluation of six precipitation datasets across Italy using the gauge-based SCIA dataset as ground-truth; • Reanalysis datasets perform best, with ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land outperforming satellite-based products; • Underestimation in mountainous areas observed across all datasets, improving at coarser temporal scales; • Reanalysis datasets recommended as the most reliable alternative in data-scarce regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102487
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy

Benedetta Moccia, Fabio Russo, Luca Buonora, Elena Ridolfi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
article

What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy

Benedetta Moccia, Fabio Russo, Luca Buonora, Elena Ridolfi, Francesco Napolitano, Claudia Bertini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Italy. Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales − from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones − to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives. The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales. • Evaluation of six precipitation datasets across Italy using the gauge-based SCIA dataset as ground-truth; • Reanalysis datasets perform best, with ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land outperforming satellite-based products; • Underestimation in mountainous areas observed across all datasets, improving at coarser temporal scales; • Reanalysis datasets recommended as the most reliable alternative in data-scarce regions.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 60
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.