Assessing Critical Traffic Scenarios: A Modular Evaluation Framework

Reliably identifying relevant and safety-critical traffic scenarios is a central challenge in developing automated driving systems (ADSs). The development of objective measures to detect the intuitively perceived level of criticality across various scenarios remains unresolved. The major challenge lies in the evaluation of all sensitive metrics of all participants in a scenario, which goes beyond assessing individual criticality metrics or providing only non-operational definitions. To address these challenges, a modular and practice-oriented framework that assesses traffic criticality is proposed. Vehicular and environmental data can be used to objectively measure individual critical elements of traffic, which are then aggregated into a comprehensive scenario assessment. The framework is illustrated by applying it (i) to two maneuvers discussing effects of single criticality metrics and (ii) to two widely used datasets featuring highway and intersecting traffic for a statistical analysis. The assessment framework can be applied in many scenarios, ranging from identifying safety critical scenarios in existing data as a fundament for early development of ADSs to detecting safety critical emergency maneuvers in live data to trigger a deployed ADS. Fundamental to this process is the suitable selection of metrics, thresholds for critical behavior, and the system’s sensitivity in aggregating partially critical scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2025.3546081
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Critical Traffic Scenarios: A Modular Evaluation Framework

Corinna Köpke, Ivo Häring, Henning Höpfner, Florian Lüttner et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.32
article

Assessing Critical Traffic Scenarios: A Modular Evaluation Framework

Corinna Köpke, Ivo Häring, Henning Höpfner, Florian Lüttner, Alexander Stolz, Daniel Schmidt, M. Fehling–Kaschek, Frank Hantschel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Reliably identifying relevant and safety-critical traffic scenarios is a central challenge in developing automated driving systems (ADSs). The development of objective measures to detect the intuitively perceived level of criticality across various scenarios remains unresolved. The major challenge lies in the evaluation of all sensitive metrics of all participants in a scenario, which goes beyond assessing individual criticality metrics or providing only non-operational definitions. To address these challenges, a modular and practice-oriented framework that assesses traffic criticality is proposed. Vehicular and environmental data can be used to objectively measure individual critical elements of traffic, which are then aggregated into a comprehensive scenario assessment. The framework is illustrated by applying it (i) to two maneuvers discussing effects of single criticality metrics and (ii) to two widely used datasets featuring highway and intersecting traffic for a statistical analysis. The assessment framework can be applied in many scenarios, ranging from identifying safety critical scenarios in existing data as a fundament for early development of ADSs to detecting safety critical emergency maneuvers in live data to trigger a deployed ADS. Fundamental to this process is the suitable selection of metrics, thresholds for critical behavior, and the system’s sensitivity in aggregating partially critical scenarios.

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsVol. 26(6)
University of Freiburg (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut (DE), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.