Formulation, analyses, and acceptability of root-crops kropek

This study was conducted to develop root-crops kropek. The products of this study were evaluated as to sensory qualities and acceptability in terms of appearance, aroma, taste and crispiness. Significant differences in the sensory qualities and acceptability were also determined. Shelf-life of root-crops kropek was also determine and submit the best product (cassava kropek) for microbial and proximate analysis. The study was a developmental- experimental research that used the Completely Randomized Design (CRD), with three (3) treatments in three trials. Scorecards with Nine Point Hedonic Scales was utilized in the collection of data. The analysis included the calculation of arithmetic means and the application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to detect significant differences among treatments. The sensory qualities of root-crops kropek were evaluated by 10 semi-trained panelist and the general acceptability was evaluated by 100 consumers. The results from the sensory evaluation shows that Treatment A (Cassava Kropek) was the best in all quality attributes. As to the general acceptability of Root-crops Kropek data reveals that Treatment A (Cassava Kropek) was the most preferred among the three treatments which was "Liked Extremely" by the consumer, while Treatment B (Sweet Potato Kropek) and Treatment C (Taro Kropek) followed closely with mean score having qualitative description of “Liked Very Much”. The significant difference was observed in the appearance and aroma of the Root-crops Kropek, whereas taste and crispiness showed no significant difference. Furthermore, based on the consumer's acceptability as a whole there was a significant difference among the three treatments in terms of the sensory qualities of the Root-crops Kropek in favor of treatment A. Upon testing the proximate analysis of the best product, it was found out that there was a substantial amount of nutrients needed for human body. The root-crops kropek were safe for human consumption as the results of microbial analysis of the product and based on the BFAD standard for microorganism test for products belonging to the Snack Foods category.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0402106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formulation, analyses, and acceptability of root-crops kropek

Randy Dolorico
1 citations
Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
0.81
article

Formulation, analyses, and acceptability of root-crops kropek

Randy Dolorico
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop root-crops kropek. The products of this study were evaluated as to sensory qualities and acceptability in terms of appearance, aroma, taste and crispiness. Significant differences in the sensory qualities and acceptability were also determined. Shelf-life of root-crops kropek was also determine and submit the best product (cassava kropek) for microbial and proximate analysis. The study was a developmental- experimental research that used the Completely Randomized Design (CRD), with three (3) treatments in three trials. Scorecards with Nine Point Hedonic Scales was utilized in the collection of data. The analysis included the calculation of arithmetic means and the application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to detect significant differences among treatments. The sensory qualities of root-crops kropek were evaluated by 10 semi-trained panelist and the general acceptability was evaluated by 100 consumers. The results from the sensory evaluation shows that Treatment A (Cassava Kropek) was the best in all quality attributes. As to the general acceptability of Root-crops Kropek data reveals that Treatment A (Cassava Kropek) was the most preferred among the three treatments which was "Liked Extremely" by the consumer, while Treatment B (Sweet Potato Kropek) and Treatment C (Taro Kropek) followed closely with mean score having qualitative description of “Liked Very Much”. The significant difference was observed in the appearance and aroma of the Root-crops Kropek, whereas taste and crispiness showed no significant difference. Furthermore, based on the consumer's acceptability as a whole there was a significant difference among the three treatments in terms of the sensory qualities of the Root-crops Kropek in favor of treatment A. Upon testing the proximate analysis of the best product, it was found out that there was a substantial amount of nutrients needed for human body. The root-crops kropek were safe for human consumption as the results of microbial analysis of the product and based on the BFAD standard for microorganism test for products belonging to the Snack Foods category.

Pantao, international journal of the humanities and social sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Plant tissue culture and regeneration
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.