The combined negative effect of temperature, UV radiation and salinity on eDNA detection: A global meta-analysis on aquatic ecosystems

• eDNA detection probability decreases in hotter regions and seasons. • eDNA detection efficiency was reduced at lower latitudes. • Temperature, independently and in combination with UV, reduced the eDNA detection. • eDNA detection probability was lower in marine than river and lake ecosystems. Anthropogenic changes in global aquatic biodiversity necessitate the urgent adoption of more efficient biomonitoring approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a powerful tool that has enhanced the field of biomonitoring. However, the efficiency of eDNA detection can be hindered by various environmental and methodological factors. This is an area of active research that has not yet been fully crystallized, especially on a large scale where variations in environmental factors might unmask further intricacies. Here, we aimed to investigate the impact of key environmental factors across broad biogeographical areas on eDNA detection and explore how methodological variations in eDNA-based biomonitoring might influence detection outcomes —through a synthesis study conducted under real-world conditions. To address this, we performed a literature search and compiled a dataset from 22 studies of species occurrence from both eDNA and traditional approaches. We examined the effects of temperature, UV, salinity, filter pore size, and DNA fragment length on eDNA detection probability —defined as the likelihood of detecting species through eDNA relative to the total number of species detected by both approaches. The results revealed that temperature, independently and in combination with UV, consistently reduced eDNA detection, meaning that eDNA detection fell in hotter locations and seasons with more intense UV exposure. Similarly, salinity exerts a slight negative impact, whereas filter pore size and DNA fragment size show no effect. Our findings highlight the intricate spatial–temporal effects of environmental factors on eDNA detection efficacy, emphasizing the need to consider them in the execution of eDNA studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113669
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The combined negative effect of temperature, UV radiation and salinity on eDNA detection: A global meta-analysis on aquatic ecosystems

Milad Shokri, Eftychia Tzafesta
12 citations
Ecological Indicators
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
20.60
article

The combined negative effect of temperature, UV radiation and salinity on eDNA detection: A global meta-analysis on aquatic ecosystems

Milad Shokri, Eftychia Tzafesta
article en
12 citations

Abstract

• eDNA detection probability decreases in hotter regions and seasons. • eDNA detection efficiency was reduced at lower latitudes. • Temperature, independently and in combination with UV, reduced the eDNA detection. • eDNA detection probability was lower in marine than river and lake ecosystems. Anthropogenic changes in global aquatic biodiversity necessitate the urgent adoption of more efficient biomonitoring approaches. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a powerful tool that has enhanced the field of biomonitoring. However, the efficiency of eDNA detection can be hindered by various environmental and methodological factors. This is an area of active research that has not yet been fully crystallized, especially on a large scale where variations in environmental factors might unmask further intricacies. Here, we aimed to investigate the impact of key environmental factors across broad biogeographical areas on eDNA detection and explore how methodological variations in eDNA-based biomonitoring might influence detection outcomes —through a synthesis study conducted under real-world conditions. To address this, we performed a literature search and compiled a dataset from 22 studies of species occurrence from both eDNA and traditional approaches. We examined the effects of temperature, UV, salinity, filter pore size, and DNA fragment length on eDNA detection probability —defined as the likelihood of detecting species through eDNA relative to the total number of species detected by both approaches. The results revealed that temperature, independently and in combination with UV, consistently reduced eDNA detection, meaning that eDNA detection fell in hotter locations and seasons with more intense UV exposure. Similarly, salinity exerts a slight negative impact, whereas filter pore size and DNA fragment size show no effect. Our findings highlight the intricate spatial–temporal effects of environmental factors on eDNA detection efficacy, emphasizing the need to consider them in the execution of eDNA studies.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 176
University of Salento (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
20.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.