Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review

Research on energy communities moves from being a residual until 2014 to one of the key issues for the energy policies in 2025. To date, no systematic literature review on energy communities has comprehensively examined both the periods before and after the 2018–2019 EU Directives, while also avoiding a narrow focus on specific objectives and instead considering the entire research field. The present article is built upon a twenty-year dataset spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 collected from the Scopus database. We explore key topics and schools of thought, trend themes, international collaborations, and applied methodologies, with particular focus on the evolution of the field and the economic impacts. The study's dataset contains 813 papers from 273 journals, conference proceedings, and books. A descriptive analysis of the most influential journals and authors in the field is performed at the beginning followed by more advanced bibliometric methods. “Bibliometrix” package for R statistical software is used as a tool. Building on results of the bibliometric investigation, a systematic literature review is conducted manually focusing on titles, keywords, and abstracts. The field initially focused on UK case studies using sociological theories for replication, while Continental Europe emphasized top-down factors like policies and institutions fostering EC growth. Organizational and policy aspects dominated research, shifting toward innovative technology integration into communities with the advent of EU Directives. Outside Europe, the USA, Australia, Canada, Brazil, India, and China lead contributions. Future trends likely include further scrutinization of ‘energy commons’ at a time of increase of community models, policy comparisons and technology integration. Legal aspects and interactions with electricity markets remain underexplored. • British researchers pioneered energy communities, focusing on grassroots innovation. • European studies highlight subsidies as key to energy community emergence and growth. • Energy communities in Asia, Africa and Latin America are often studied as off-grid microgrids. • Post-2018–2019 EU Directives (RED II, IEM), focus shifted to technology integration. • Legal aspects and market interactions of energy communities remain underexplored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115871
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review

Maksym Koltunov, Lorenzo De Vidovich
4 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
4.42
article

Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review

Maksym Koltunov, Lorenzo De Vidovich
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Research on energy communities moves from being a residual until 2014 to one of the key issues for the energy policies in 2025. To date, no systematic literature review on energy communities has comprehensively examined both the periods before and after the 2018–2019 EU Directives, while also avoiding a narrow focus on specific objectives and instead considering the entire research field. The present article is built upon a twenty-year dataset spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 collected from the Scopus database. We explore key topics and schools of thought, trend themes, international collaborations, and applied methodologies, with particular focus on the evolution of the field and the economic impacts. The study's dataset contains 813 papers from 273 journals, conference proceedings, and books. A descriptive analysis of the most influential journals and authors in the field is performed at the beginning followed by more advanced bibliometric methods. “Bibliometrix” package for R statistical software is used as a tool. Building on results of the bibliometric investigation, a systematic literature review is conducted manually focusing on titles, keywords, and abstracts. The field initially focused on UK case studies using sociological theories for replication, while Continental Europe emphasized top-down factors like policies and institutions fostering EC growth. Organizational and policy aspects dominated research, shifting toward innovative technology integration into communities with the advent of EU Directives. Outside Europe, the USA, Australia, Canada, Brazil, India, and China lead contributions. Future trends likely include further scrutinization of ‘energy commons’ at a time of increase of community models, policy comparisons and technology integration. Legal aspects and interactions with electricity markets remain underexplored. • British researchers pioneered energy communities, focusing on grassroots innovation. • European studies highlight subsidies as key to energy community emergence and growth. • Energy communities in Asia, Africa and Latin America are often studied as off-grid microgrids. • Post-2018–2019 EU Directives (RED II, IEM), focus shifted to technology integration. • Legal aspects and market interactions of energy communities remain underexplored.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 220
University of Trieste (IT), University of Milan (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.