Variant specific treatment effects with applications in vaccine studies

Pathogens usually exist in heterogeneous variants, like subtypes and strains. Quantifying treatment effects on the different variants is important for guiding prevention policies and vaccine development. Here, we ground analyses of variant-specific effects on a formal framework for causal inference. This allows us to clarify the interpretation of existing methods and define new estimands. Unlike most of the existing literature, we explicitly consider the (realistic) setting with interference in the target population: even if individuals can be sensibly perceived as iid in randomized trial data, there will often be interference in the target population where treatments, such as vaccines, are rolled out. Thus, one of our contributions is to derive explicit conditions guaranteeing that commonly reported vaccine efficacy parameters quantify well-defined causal effects, also in the presence of interference. Furthermore, our results give alternative justifications for reporting estimands on the relative, rather than absolute, scale. We illustrate the findings with an analysis of a large HIV1 vaccine trial, where there is interest in distinguishing vaccine effects on viruses with different genome sequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrics
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujaf068
Primary Topic
HIV Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variant specific treatment effects with applications in vaccine studies

Mats Julius Stensrud, Gellért Perényi
Biometrics
HIV Research and Treatment
article

Variant specific treatment effects with applications in vaccine studies

Mats Julius Stensrud, Gellért Perényi
article en

Abstract

Pathogens usually exist in heterogeneous variants, like subtypes and strains. Quantifying treatment effects on the different variants is important for guiding prevention policies and vaccine development. Here, we ground analyses of variant-specific effects on a formal framework for causal inference. This allows us to clarify the interpretation of existing methods and define new estimands. Unlike most of the existing literature, we explicitly consider the (realistic) setting with interference in the target population: even if individuals can be sensibly perceived as iid in randomized trial data, there will often be interference in the target population where treatments, such as vaccines, are rolled out. Thus, one of our contributions is to derive explicit conditions guaranteeing that commonly reported vaccine efficacy parameters quantify well-defined causal effects, also in the presence of interference. Furthermore, our results give alternative justifications for reporting estimands on the relative, rather than absolute, scale. We illustrate the findings with an analysis of a large HIV1 vaccine trial, where there is interest in distinguishing vaccine effects on viruses with different genome sequences.

BiometricsVol. 81(2)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Mathematics (CZ), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
HIV Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.