Pairing relationships of howardites, eucrites and diogenites ( <scp>HED</scp> ) from the Miller Range ice fields, Antarctica

Abstract We reevaluated pairing relationships among 56 Antarctic howardites, eucrites, and diogenites (HED) from the Miller Range ice fields (MIL) based on new measurements of cosmogenic radionuclides and bulk composition of 28 HED samples and one HED‐related dunite. These measurements were combined with petrographic examinations and find locations of the majority of the HED samples at MIL. During these studies, we reclassified 1 howardite, MIL 07665, as a brecciated diogenite and eight howardites as brecciated eucrites. We conclude that 18 of the 23 diogenites belong to a single large pairing group of brecciated diogenites. This pairing group includes at least seven samples with bulk compositions that indicate they contain 10%–25% of eucritic material, so technically the meteorites of this pairing group cross the boundary between diogenites and howardites. We also identified several smaller pairing groups (of 2–5 members each) among the eucrites and two paired samples among the howardites. The pairing relationships among the Miller Range eucrites are not fully resolved yet, as the collection contains many small specimens (&lt;10 g) that were not included in this study. Altogether, we conclude that the 56 HED meteorites at Miller Range represent between 19 and 26 individual falls.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.14376
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pairing relationships of howardites, eucrites and diogenites ( HED ) from the Miller Range ice fields, Antarctica

Marc W. Caffee, K. C. Welten, K. Righter, R. P. Harvey et al.
1 citations
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.30
article

Pairing relationships of howardites, eucrites and diogenites ( HED ) from the Miller Range ice fields, Antarctica

Marc W. Caffee, K. C. Welten, K. Righter, R. P. Harvey, James M. Karner, John Schutt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We reevaluated pairing relationships among 56 Antarctic howardites, eucrites, and diogenites (HED) from the Miller Range ice fields (MIL) based on new measurements of cosmogenic radionuclides and bulk composition of 28 HED samples and one HED‐related dunite. These measurements were combined with petrographic examinations and find locations of the majority of the HED samples at MIL. During these studies, we reclassified 1 howardite, MIL 07665, as a brecciated diogenite and eight howardites as brecciated eucrites. We conclude that 18 of the 23 diogenites belong to a single large pairing group of brecciated diogenites. This pairing group includes at least seven samples with bulk compositions that indicate they contain 10%–25% of eucritic material, so technically the meteorites of this pairing group cross the boundary between diogenites and howardites. We also identified several smaller pairing groups (of 2–5 members each) among the eucrites and two paired samples among the howardites. The pairing relationships among the Miller Range eucrites are not fully resolved yet, as the collection contains many small specimens (&lt;10 g) that were not included in this study. Altogether, we conclude that the 56 HED meteorites at Miller Range represent between 19 and 26 individual falls.

Meteoritics and Planetary ScienceVol. 60(7)
Natural Environment Research Council (GB), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Utah (US), Johnson Space Center (US), University of Rochester (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.