Enhancing pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making: application to healthcare waste management

Abstract Accepted by: M. Zied Babai This paper introduces a new approach to group decision-making called the Belief Interval-Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BI-FBWM). It builds on existing decision-making techniques by more effectively incorporating uncertainty and differing expert opinions. Although the proposed method is as simple to use as traditional approaches, it adds three key steps to enhance accuracy: calculating reference comparisons, constructing decision matrices to capture uncertainty, and applying a new mathematical model to assign importance to various criteria. The method was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic and applied to evaluate healthcare waste management practices. In addition, this study proposes a new assessment framework tailored to pandemic conditions, based on guidelines from the World Health Organization and national health authorities. Finally, comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed methodology offers clear advantages in handling complex decision problems under uncertainty when compared with the original Best-Worst Method (BWM), FBWM and its variants within the D number environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpaf020
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making: application to healthcare waste management

Alessio Ishizaka, Mostafa Kazemi, Nastaran Goldani, Jehangir Khan
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

Enhancing pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making: application to healthcare waste management

Alessio Ishizaka, Mostafa Kazemi, Nastaran Goldani, Jehangir Khan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accepted by: M. Zied Babai This paper introduces a new approach to group decision-making called the Belief Interval-Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BI-FBWM). It builds on existing decision-making techniques by more effectively incorporating uncertainty and differing expert opinions. Although the proposed method is as simple to use as traditional approaches, it adds three key steps to enhance accuracy: calculating reference comparisons, constructing decision matrices to capture uncertainty, and applying a new mathematical model to assign importance to various criteria. The method was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic and applied to evaluate healthcare waste management practices. In addition, this study proposes a new assessment framework tailored to pandemic conditions, based on guidelines from the World Health Organization and national health authorities. Finally, comparative analysis demonstrates that the proposed methodology offers clear advantages in handling complex decision problems under uncertainty when compared with the original Best-Worst Method (BWM), FBWM and its variants within the D number environment.

IMA Journal of Management MathematicsVol. 36(4)
NEOMA Business School (FR), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing pairwise comparisons for multi-criteria decision making: application to healthcare waste management — Alessio Ishizaka, Mostafa Kazemi, et al. · IMA Journal of Management Mathematics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS