Intersectional dynamics and care disparities in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a socio-technical systems perspective

Electronic Fetal Monitoring is a socially and contextually interpreted tool used to support particular interventions or inactions. Electronic Fetal Monitoring management is subject to systematic contextual influences, maternal Social Determinants of Health and biases that may further contribute to disparities in labour care and outcomes. Addressing maternal Social Determinants of Health while providing Electronic Fetal Monitoring care is vital to promoting equitable care, facilitating a positive experience and improving health outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07765-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional dynamics and care disparities in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a socio-technical systems perspective

Verónica Blanco Gutiérrez, Natalie Darko, Kenton O’Hara, Antoniya Georgieva et al.
1 citations
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
2.06
article

Intersectional dynamics and care disparities in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a socio-technical systems perspective

Verónica Blanco Gutiérrez, Natalie Darko, Kenton O’Hara, Antoniya Georgieva, Lyuba V. Bozhilova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Electronic Fetal Monitoring is a socially and contextually interpreted tool used to support particular interventions or inactions. Electronic Fetal Monitoring management is subject to systematic contextual influences, maternal Social Determinants of Health and biases that may further contribute to disparities in labour care and outcomes. Addressing maternal Social Determinants of Health while providing Electronic Fetal Monitoring care is vital to promoting equitable care, facilitating a positive experience and improving health outcomes.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 25(1)
University of Leicester (GB), At Bristol (GB), Oxford Research Group (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
University of Bristol, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intersectional dynamics and care disparities in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: a socio-technical systems perspective — Verónica Blanco Gutiérrez, Natalie Darko, et al. · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS