Extending the Turn to Work: New Directions in the Study of Social‐Symbolic Work in Organizational Life

Abstract Over the last two decades, a growing number of studies of novel forms of social‐symbolic work (e.g., identity work, boundary work, institutional work, values work, etc.) have appeared in the organization and management studies literature. This growing body of research – the ‘turn to work’ in organization theory – has provided important new insights into how actors purposefully participate in the social construction of organizations and their contexts. The aim of this special issue is to build on and extend these insights and in this introductory essay we begin by outlining a framework that provides a useful meta‐theory – the social‐symbolic work perspective – for integrating this stream of research. This perspective revolves around two key concepts: ‘social‐symbolic objects’ defined as meaningful patterns in a social system; and ‘social‐symbolic work’ defined as conscious, reflexive efforts to shape social‐symbolic objects. We then introduce the articles that appear in this special issue and identify important cross‐cutting themes. Drawing on these articles, we go on to identify potentially fruitful areas for future research on social‐symbolic work and end with a challenge to organizational scholars to build on this special issue to move our understanding of social‐symbolic work forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Studies
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13247
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending the Turn to Work: New Directions in the Study of Social‐Symbolic Work in Organizational Life

Brianna Barker Caza, Hannes Leroy, Thomas B. Lawrence, Emily Heaphy et al.
8 citations
Journal of Management Studies
Management and Organizational Studies
16.58
article

Extending the Turn to Work: New Directions in the Study of Social‐Symbolic Work in Organizational Life

Brianna Barker Caza, Hannes Leroy, Thomas B. Lawrence, Emily Heaphy, Nelson Phillips
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over the last two decades, a growing number of studies of novel forms of social‐symbolic work (e.g., identity work, boundary work, institutional work, values work, etc.) have appeared in the organization and management studies literature. This growing body of research – the ‘turn to work’ in organization theory – has provided important new insights into how actors purposefully participate in the social construction of organizations and their contexts. The aim of this special issue is to build on and extend these insights and in this introductory essay we begin by outlining a framework that provides a useful meta‐theory – the social‐symbolic work perspective – for integrating this stream of research. This perspective revolves around two key concepts: ‘social‐symbolic objects’ defined as meaningful patterns in a social system; and ‘social‐symbolic work’ defined as conscious, reflexive efforts to shape social‐symbolic objects. We then introduce the articles that appear in this special issue and identify important cross‐cutting themes. Drawing on these articles, we go on to identify potentially fruitful areas for future research on social‐symbolic work and end with a challenge to organizational scholars to build on this special issue to move our understanding of social‐symbolic work forward.

Journal of Management StudiesVol. 62(8)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Management and Organizational Studies
16.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.