Cities, Local Social Policy, and Critical Human Security in Times of Turbulence: Seoul and London Compared

Focusing on the metropolitan cities of Seoul, Korea and London, England, this paper seeks to provide a better understanding of the role of cities and local social policy in addressing responses to and impacts of the pandemic, as well as in governing a place-based approach to pandemic recovery, human security, and inclusive and sustainable growth. It draws on a critical human security perspective and the application of a multi-scalar governance and territorial matrix for local social policy and social infrastructure to highlight the complex and multisectoral social and public policy challenges facing both Seoul and London in the aftermath of the pandemic as well as the overlapping, intersectional, and multi-layered insecurities, how they have evolved and strategies to address them. The study draws on secondary data sources, workshops, and qualitative interviews with key city stakeholders in both cities conducted between February 2022 and July 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Society
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746425000284
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cities, Local Social Policy, and Critical Human Security in Times of Turbulence: Seoul and London Compared

Minjun Hong, Patricia Kennett, Joon Young Yi
Social Policy and Society
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Cities, Local Social Policy, and Critical Human Security in Times of Turbulence: Seoul and London Compared

Minjun Hong, Patricia Kennett, Joon Young Yi
article en

Abstract

Focusing on the metropolitan cities of Seoul, Korea and London, England, this paper seeks to provide a better understanding of the role of cities and local social policy in addressing responses to and impacts of the pandemic, as well as in governing a place-based approach to pandemic recovery, human security, and inclusive and sustainable growth. It draws on a critical human security perspective and the application of a multi-scalar governance and territorial matrix for local social policy and social infrastructure to highlight the complex and multisectoral social and public policy challenges facing both Seoul and London in the aftermath of the pandemic as well as the overlapping, intersectional, and multi-layered insecurities, how they have evolved and strategies to address them. The study draws on secondary data sources, workshops, and qualitative interviews with key city stakeholders in both cities conducted between February 2022 and July 2023.

Social Policy and SocietyVol. 24(3)
Seoul National University (KR), University of Bristol (GB), The Seoul Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cities, Local Social Policy, and Critical Human Security in Times of Turbulence: Seoul and London Compared — Minjun Hong, Patricia Kennett, et al. · Social Policy and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS