Comparative analysis of SGA and GLIM as nutritional screening tools among oncology patients in Kochi, Kerala

Aim and background: Malnutrition is a concern among oncology patients, impacting the protocol of cancer therapy and quality of life (QoL). Kerala has evidenced a steady increase in lifestyle diseases in the last decade, cancer being one among them. Nutritional assessment is pivotal in cancer therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) in assessing nutritional status among medical oncology patients in Kochi, Kerala. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 500 medical oncology patients at a tertiary care hospital in Kochi. Nutritional status was assessed using body mass index (BMI), SGA, and GLIM criteria. Patients were classified based on BMI as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese. Based on SGA and GLIM, the patients were classified as malnourished or well-nourished, respectively. Results: The study findings revealed that 39% of patients had normal BMI, while 7%, 39%, and 38% were underweight, overweight, and obese, respectively. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers accounted for 24% of diagnoses. SGA and GLIM identified similar proportions of well-nourished patients (around 50%). However, SGA detected more severe malnutrition cases than GLIM (23 vs. 49). The agreement between SGA and GLIM in identifying malnutrition was moderate (Cohen’s kappa = 0.468). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of SGA and GLIM in nutritional assessment among medical oncology patients in Kerala. Our findings highlight the need for standardized nutritional screening protocols in oncology settings. The moderate agreement between SGA and GLIM suggests that both tools can be valuable in clinical practice, potentially complementing each other in comprehensive patient care. These results contribute to the growing body of research on nutritional assessment in cancer patients, particularly in the Indian context, where cancer incidence is increasing rapidly. Our study emphasizes the importance of nutritional assessment in oncology practice to improve treatment outcomes and QoL for patients in Kerala and similar settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of Nutrition Pharmacology Neurological Diseases
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnpnd.ijnpnd_141_24
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of SGA and GLIM as nutritional screening tools among oncology patients in Kochi, Kerala

Manju P. George, R. Nassar, Rashmi H. Poojara, Fatima Kausar Nawaz et al.
International journal of Nutrition Pharmacology Neurological Diseases
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Comparative analysis of SGA and GLIM as nutritional screening tools among oncology patients in Kochi, Kerala

Manju P. George, R. Nassar, Rashmi H. Poojara, Fatima Kausar Nawaz, Sarah Joseph
article en

Abstract

Aim and background: Malnutrition is a concern among oncology patients, impacting the protocol of cancer therapy and quality of life (QoL). Kerala has evidenced a steady increase in lifestyle diseases in the last decade, cancer being one among them. Nutritional assessment is pivotal in cancer therapy. This study evaluated the efficacy of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) in assessing nutritional status among medical oncology patients in Kochi, Kerala. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 500 medical oncology patients at a tertiary care hospital in Kochi. Nutritional status was assessed using body mass index (BMI), SGA, and GLIM criteria. Patients were classified based on BMI as underweight, normal, overweight, and obese. Based on SGA and GLIM, the patients were classified as malnourished or well-nourished, respectively. Results: The study findings revealed that 39% of patients had normal BMI, while 7%, 39%, and 38% were underweight, overweight, and obese, respectively. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers accounted for 24% of diagnoses. SGA and GLIM identified similar proportions of well-nourished patients (around 50%). However, SGA detected more severe malnutrition cases than GLIM (23 vs. 49). The agreement between SGA and GLIM in identifying malnutrition was moderate (Cohen’s kappa = 0.468). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of SGA and GLIM in nutritional assessment among medical oncology patients in Kerala. Our findings highlight the need for standardized nutritional screening protocols in oncology settings. The moderate agreement between SGA and GLIM suggests that both tools can be valuable in clinical practice, potentially complementing each other in comprehensive patient care. These results contribute to the growing body of research on nutritional assessment in cancer patients, particularly in the Indian context, where cancer incidence is increasing rapidly. Our study emphasizes the importance of nutritional assessment in oncology practice to improve treatment outcomes and QoL for patients in Kerala and similar settings.

International journal of Nutrition Pharmacology Neurological DiseasesVol. 15(2)
Lakeshore Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.