Low‐input, interpretable models to forecast maize yield at multiple scales based on absorbed radiation

Abstract Most crop yield forecast models operate at coarse scales (e.g., county or region) or need extensive input data for finer resolutions. Here, we present maize ( Zea mays L.) yield forecast models that require minimal user data and operate at field and regional scales throughout the growing season. Using 1853 maize field‐years in Argentina, with known location, sowing date, and yield, our models leveraged absorbed radiation (from satellite imagery), temperature‐based phenology, regional site‐year properties, El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase predictions, and sowing period. At the field scale, our models achieved high accuracy at physiological maturity, with a mean error of 1 t ha −1 (16%). Yield forecasts were mainly driven by absorbed radiation during the reproductive phase and a regional factor. Early‐season forecasts incorporated ENSO and sowing period, but with reduced accuracy. When scaled to regional forecasts, the models performed even better, with a mean error of 0.3 t ha −1 (4%). These results combine a novel case of yield forecast because of the low data requirements from users, high anticipation (30–90 days before harvest), and good levels of accuracy at both field and regional scales. Additionally, the models’ interpretability makes them valuable diagnostic tools for post‐season analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low‐input, interpretable models to forecast maize yield at multiple scales based on absorbed radiation

Diego Hernán Rotili, Carlos M. Di Bella, Gustavo Martini, Gervasio Piñeiro et al.
1 citations
Agronomy Journal
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
article

Low‐input, interpretable models to forecast maize yield at multiple scales based on absorbed radiation

Diego Hernán Rotili, Carlos M. Di Bella, Gustavo Martini, Gervasio Piñeiro, María E. Otegui, Martı́n Oesterheld, María Paolini, Martin Menendez‐Coccoz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Most crop yield forecast models operate at coarse scales (e.g., county or region) or need extensive input data for finer resolutions. Here, we present maize ( Zea mays L.) yield forecast models that require minimal user data and operate at field and regional scales throughout the growing season. Using 1853 maize field‐years in Argentina, with known location, sowing date, and yield, our models leveraged absorbed radiation (from satellite imagery), temperature‐based phenology, regional site‐year properties, El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phase predictions, and sowing period. At the field scale, our models achieved high accuracy at physiological maturity, with a mean error of 1 t ha −1 (16%). Yield forecasts were mainly driven by absorbed radiation during the reproductive phase and a regional factor. Early‐season forecasts incorporated ENSO and sowing period, but with reduced accuracy. When scaled to regional forecasts, the models performed even better, with a mean error of 0.3 t ha −1 (4%). These results combine a novel case of yield forecast because of the low data requirements from users, high anticipation (30–90 days before harvest), and good levels of accuracy at both field and regional scales. Additionally, the models’ interpretability makes them valuable diagnostic tools for post‐season analysis.

Agronomy JournalVol. 117(3)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Agricultural Plant Physiology and Ecology Research Institute (AR), Asociación por los Derechos Civiles (AR)
Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.