Clinical and prognostic characteristics of metastatic colorectal cancer with minor <i>RAS</i> mutations

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presents notable therapeutic challenges. Rat sarcoma virus (<i>RAS</i>) mutations, including those in <i>KRAS</i> exon 2, are critical for treatment decisions; however, the role of minor <i>RAS</i> mutations (<i>KRAS</i> exons 3 and 4, and <i>NRAS</i>) remains underexplored. Because these mutations are increasingly identified in routine practice due to advances in <i>RAS</i> mutation testing that now routinely includes <i>KRAS</i> exons 3 and 4, and <i>NRAS</i>, clarifying their clinical relevance has become important for ensuring appropriate treatment selection. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with mCRC with minor <i>RAS</i> mutations to those with <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations. To this end, data were retrospectively collected from patients with mCRC and <i>RAS</i> mutations between August 2018 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on <i>RAS</i> mutation subtype: <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 or minor <i>RAS</i> mutations. <i>RAS</i> mutation testing was performed using the MEBGEN RASKET™-B kit. Clinical characteristics, tumor location, metastatic patterns and survival outcomes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 202 patients with <i>RAS</i> mutations, 170 had <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations, whereas 32 exhibited minor <i>RAS</i> mutations (20 with non-exon 2 <i>KRAS</i> mutations and 12 with <i>NRAS</i> mutations). Minor <i>RAS</i> mutations were more common in left-sided CRC. No significant differences in background were observed between the two groups. Log-rank OS was comparable for patients with <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 and minor <i>RAS</i> mutations. OS and PFS with first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy were also similar between the two groups. In conclusion, the prognostic impact of minor <i>RAS</i> mutations appears to be comparable to that of <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations, suggesting that the current treatment strategies for <i>RAS</i>-mutant CRC may not require modification based on these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2025.15123
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and prognostic characteristics of metastatic colorectal cancer with minor RAS mutations

Jun‐ichi Nishimura, Toshihiro Kudo, Mikiya Ishihara, Yoshinori Kagawa et al.
Oncology Letters
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Clinical and prognostic characteristics of metastatic colorectal cancer with minor RAS mutations

Jun‐ichi Nishimura, Toshihiro Kudo, Mikiya Ishihara, Yoshinori Kagawa, Daisuke Sakai, Minako Nishio, Tomoyuki Otsuka, Ryota Mori, Toshinori Sueda, Yumi Amano, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Takeda, Yoshiki Kojitani, Toshinari Yagi, Takatsugu Ogata
article en

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presents notable therapeutic challenges. Rat sarcoma virus (<i>RAS</i>) mutations, including those in <i>KRAS</i> exon 2, are critical for treatment decisions; however, the role of minor <i>RAS</i> mutations (<i>KRAS</i> exons 3 and 4, and <i>NRAS</i>) remains underexplored. Because these mutations are increasingly identified in routine practice due to advances in <i>RAS</i> mutation testing that now routinely includes <i>KRAS</i> exons 3 and 4, and <i>NRAS</i>, clarifying their clinical relevance has become important for ensuring appropriate treatment selection. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and prognostic characteristics of patients with mCRC with minor <i>RAS</i> mutations to those with <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations. To this end, data were retrospectively collected from patients with mCRC and <i>RAS</i> mutations between August 2018 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on <i>RAS</i> mutation subtype: <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 or minor <i>RAS</i> mutations. <i>RAS</i> mutation testing was performed using the MEBGEN RASKET™-B kit. Clinical characteristics, tumor location, metastatic patterns and survival outcomes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Of 202 patients with <i>RAS</i> mutations, 170 had <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations, whereas 32 exhibited minor <i>RAS</i> mutations (20 with non-exon 2 <i>KRAS</i> mutations and 12 with <i>NRAS</i> mutations). Minor <i>RAS</i> mutations were more common in left-sided CRC. No significant differences in background were observed between the two groups. Log-rank OS was comparable for patients with <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 and minor <i>RAS</i> mutations. OS and PFS with first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy were also similar between the two groups. In conclusion, the prognostic impact of minor <i>RAS</i> mutations appears to be comparable to that of <i>KRAS</i> exon 2 mutations, suggesting that the current treatment strategies for <i>RAS</i>-mutant CRC may not require modification based on these findings.

Oncology LettersVol. 30(2)
Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Nara Medical University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.