The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO and the shutdown of USAID disrupt global health governance, threatening disease surveillance and reversing progress made in combating HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria through initiatives like PEPFAR. The WHO's central role in coordinating global health responses, exemplified by its leadership in the COVAX initiative, is critical to pandemic preparedness and equitable vaccine distribution. The disengagement decision undermines humanitarian relief efforts, particularly in fragile states where U.S. contributions are vital for food security, education, and healthcare. This policy brief outlines actionable recommendations to mitigate the risks of U.S. disengagement, focusing on regional health capacity-building, public-private partnerships, and the continuation of critical investments in global health systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1589010
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations

Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Auwal Rabiu Auwal, Abubakar Sunusi Ishak, Abbas Musa et al.
10 citations
Frontiers in Public Health
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
13.96
article

The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations

Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Auwal Rabiu Auwal, Abubakar Sunusi Ishak, Abbas Musa, Abubakar Saadu, Anila Riaz
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO and the shutdown of USAID disrupt global health governance, threatening disease surveillance and reversing progress made in combating HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria through initiatives like PEPFAR. The WHO's central role in coordinating global health responses, exemplified by its leadership in the COVAX initiative, is critical to pandemic preparedness and equitable vaccine distribution. The disengagement decision undermines humanitarian relief efforts, particularly in fragile states where U.S. contributions are vital for food security, education, and healthcare. This policy brief outlines actionable recommendations to mitigate the risks of U.S. disengagement, focusing on regional health capacity-building, public-private partnerships, and the continuation of critical investments in global health systems.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Ahmadu Bello University (NG), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Bayero University Kano (NG)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
13.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations — Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Auwal Rabiu Auwal, et al. · Frontiers in Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS