Reconciling fiscal decentralization, environmental protection expenditures, and stringent regulations with the ecological priorities of the European Union

This study elucidates how fiscal decentralization affects environmental sustainability, moderating the role of environmental policy stringency in the selected European Union (EU) countries between 1995 and 2020. In addition, economic upturn, import diversification, and environmental protection expenditures are utilized as control variables. The empirical findings of the Method of the Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) disclosed that the environmental policy stringency and environmental protection expenditures help the EU achieve ecological priorities. In addition, import diversification also spurs environmental sustainability, with more substantial impacts on less energy and carbon–efficient nations. Furthermore, the MMQR outcomes divulged that fiscal decentralization (all indicators) endorsed the environmental deterioration of EU members, undermining the achievement of ecological urgencies. Nonetheless, via the means of environmental policy stringency, fiscal decentralization positively influences environmental sustainability. These findings unveil that the harmful impact of fiscal decentralization on environmental sustainability can be curtailed if EU members impose more stringent environmental policies. Herein, to fulfil the targets of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular, SDG7 and SDG13, EU members should consolidate fiscal decentralization initiatives and environmental policy stringency to ensure the achievement of ecological priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1600303
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling fiscal decentralization, environmental protection expenditures, and stringent regulations with the ecological priorities of the European Union

Oluwatoyin Abidemi Somoye, Elma Šatrović, Banji Rildwan Olaleye, Joseph Nembo Lekunze
5 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
article

Reconciling fiscal decentralization, environmental protection expenditures, and stringent regulations with the ecological priorities of the European Union

Oluwatoyin Abidemi Somoye, Elma Šatrović, Banji Rildwan Olaleye, Joseph Nembo Lekunze
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study elucidates how fiscal decentralization affects environmental sustainability, moderating the role of environmental policy stringency in the selected European Union (EU) countries between 1995 and 2020. In addition, economic upturn, import diversification, and environmental protection expenditures are utilized as control variables. The empirical findings of the Method of the Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) disclosed that the environmental policy stringency and environmental protection expenditures help the EU achieve ecological priorities. In addition, import diversification also spurs environmental sustainability, with more substantial impacts on less energy and carbon–efficient nations. Furthermore, the MMQR outcomes divulged that fiscal decentralization (all indicators) endorsed the environmental deterioration of EU members, undermining the achievement of ecological urgencies. Nonetheless, via the means of environmental policy stringency, fiscal decentralization positively influences environmental sustainability. These findings unveil that the harmful impact of fiscal decentralization on environmental sustainability can be curtailed if EU members impose more stringent environmental policies. Herein, to fulfil the targets of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular, SDG7 and SDG13, EU members should consolidate fiscal decentralization initiatives and environmental policy stringency to ensure the achievement of ecological priorities.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
North-West University (ZA), Hasan Kalyoncu University (TR), Near East University (CY)
North-West University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
15.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.