Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Cholecystitis

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is considered a significant disease all over the world. Cholecystectomy represents the only definitive management strategy for symptomatic gallstone disease. Studying the efficacy and feasibility of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of acute cholecystitis in comparison with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding procedure safety, operative time, perioperative complications, post-operative pain, total length of hospital stay, and loss of active days of work. Prospective and comparative study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 50 patients suffering from acute cholecystitis. This study will be conducted in the Department of Surgery at Al-Zahraa University Hospital. Group A: Those who come within 72 hours of the attack will undergo an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Group B: Those who come after 72 hours of attack will be admitted and given conservative management, and then they will do a late laparoscopic cholecystectomy after 4–8 weeks. Patients in both groups had comparable comorbidities, BMI, and histories of previous surgeries with statistically insignificant differences (p > 0.05). Group B had a significantly longer duration of pain (5.4±1.2 weeks) than group A (38.7±15 hours) (p<0.001). Also, 4 patients (16%) had a recurrent attack. Murphy's sign and palpable gall bladder showed insignificant differences in both groups. All preoperative laboratory findings showed insignificant differences between the study groups as p>0.05. The results of the ultrasound findings in the study groups revealed that a thick gall bladder wall was the most common finding in both groups, followed by pricholecystic fluid collection then impacted stone. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) is effective, safe, and feasible. It had no increase in operative time or perioperative complications. In terms of a shorter overall hospital stay and fewer days missed from work; it is preferable to a delayed cholecystectomy. While patients wait for definitive surgical intervention, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevents the risk of repeated attacks or the emergence of other biliary problems.

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Azhar University Journal of medical and Virus Researches and Studies.
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/aujv.2024.429892
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Cholecystitis

1 links
Al-Azhar University Journal of medical and Virus Researches and Studies.
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cases of Acute Cholecystitis

article en

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is considered a significant disease all over the world. Cholecystectomy represents the only definitive management strategy for symptomatic gallstone disease. Studying the efficacy and feasibility of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases of acute cholecystitis in comparison with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding procedure safety, operative time, perioperative complications, post-operative pain, total length of hospital stay, and loss of active days of work. Prospective and comparative study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 50 patients suffering from acute cholecystitis. This study will be conducted in the Department of Surgery at Al-Zahraa University Hospital. Group A: Those who come within 72 hours of the attack will undergo an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Group B: Those who come after 72 hours of attack will be admitted and given conservative management, and then they will do a late laparoscopic cholecystectomy after 4–8 weeks. Patients in both groups had comparable comorbidities, BMI, and histories of previous surgeries with statistically insignificant differences (p > 0.05). Group B had a significantly longer duration of pain (5.4±1.2 weeks) than group A (38.7±15 hours) (p<0.001). Also, 4 patients (16%) had a recurrent attack. Murphy's sign and palpable gall bladder showed insignificant differences in both groups. All preoperative laboratory findings showed insignificant differences between the study groups as p>0.05. The results of the ultrasound findings in the study groups revealed that a thick gall bladder wall was the most common finding in both groups, followed by pricholecystic fluid collection then impacted stone. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) is effective, safe, and feasible. It had no increase in operative time or perioperative complications. In terms of a shorter overall hospital stay and fewer days missed from work; it is preferable to a delayed cholecystectomy. While patients wait for definitive surgical intervention, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevents the risk of repeated attacks or the emergence of other biliary problems.

Al-Azhar University Journal of medical and Virus Researches and Studies.Vol. 6(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.