Entropy of Law in a Closed Society

As an open, complex organized system, law cannot be effective in a closed, internally contradictory and nonlegal political system. The subordination of law to ideology and politics, characteristic for a “closed” society, inevitably deforms all elements of legal culture, giving rise to legal nihilism. The erosion of law, disregard for its ideals and values, fixed in the public consciousness, entails a negligent attitude to the law and the rule of law. Lack of understanding of the value of law generates unformed legal knowledge, limited skills of legal activity, and leads to the destruction of the legal system. Within the framework of the synergetic scientific paradigm applied to socio-legal models, it is possible to search solutions to the problems of the legal life of society, taking into account value orientations, behavioral models, interaction of norms, the state of legal consciousness and legal culture, determining in their unity the direction of development of society and the state. The interaction of these and other, less obvious, factors allows us to consider socio-legal processes as orderly and self-organizing, in which the role of external managerial (actually legislative) influence is significant, but not decisive. In a “closed” society, the law mediating the expression of power is not derived from public opinion. The legal system of a closed society, as a category reflecting all the legal phenomena existing in society and the entire legal reality, inevitably degrades to the standard state for closed systems and is reduced to positive law and its corresponding law enforcement, serving the interests of the ruling elites. The entropy of law in such a society is due to the immanence of conflict, the irremediable contradiction between positive law and real public interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Law Journal
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17150/1819-0928.2025.26(1).19-27
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entropy of Law in a Closed Society

Vadim Antonchenko
Academic Law Journal
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Entropy of Law in a Closed Society

Vadim Antonchenko
article en

Abstract

As an open, complex organized system, law cannot be effective in a closed, internally contradictory and nonlegal political system. The subordination of law to ideology and politics, characteristic for a “closed” society, inevitably deforms all elements of legal culture, giving rise to legal nihilism. The erosion of law, disregard for its ideals and values, fixed in the public consciousness, entails a negligent attitude to the law and the rule of law. Lack of understanding of the value of law generates unformed legal knowledge, limited skills of legal activity, and leads to the destruction of the legal system. Within the framework of the synergetic scientific paradigm applied to socio-legal models, it is possible to search solutions to the problems of the legal life of society, taking into account value orientations, behavioral models, interaction of norms, the state of legal consciousness and legal culture, determining in their unity the direction of development of society and the state. The interaction of these and other, less obvious, factors allows us to consider socio-legal processes as orderly and self-organizing, in which the role of external managerial (actually legislative) influence is significant, but not decisive. In a “closed” society, the law mediating the expression of power is not derived from public opinion. The legal system of a closed society, as a category reflecting all the legal phenomena existing in society and the entire legal reality, inevitably degrades to the standard state for closed systems and is reduced to positive law and its corresponding law enforcement, serving the interests of the ruling elites. The entropy of law in such a society is due to the immanence of conflict, the irremediable contradiction between positive law and real public interests.

Academic Law JournalVol. 26(1)
Ministry of Emergency Situations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.