Framing Analysis Of The Hamas-Israel Conflict News On Online Media Kompas.Com And The New York Times

The Gaza-Israel conflict, ongoing since 1948, reignited on October 7, 2023, with a series of rockets fired by Hamas into Israel. This study analyzes the framing of the Hamas-Israel conflict in online media, specifically Kompas.com and The New York Times, using Robert N. Entman's framing analysis, which includes defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and offering treatment recommendations. This qualitative research examines 20 news articles to explore how each outlet shapes perceptions of reality. Results reveal that Kompas.com emphasizes specific facts and figures, while The New York Times highlights emotional impacts. In diagnosing causes, Kompas.com connects the issue to the suffering of Palestinians, whereas The New York Times focuses on the broader Israel-Hamas conflict. For moral judgment, Kompas.com draws on historical context and direct impacts, while The New York Times condemns violence and stresses empathy for human suffering. Regarding treatment recommendations, Kompas.com rarely presents explicit solutions, while The New York Times advocates for international diplomacy and broader approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MEDIUM
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25299/medium.v13i1.20751
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing Analysis Of The Hamas-Israel Conflict News On Online Media Kompas.Com And The New York Times

Suyanto Suyanto, Marshelli
MEDIUM
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Framing Analysis Of The Hamas-Israel Conflict News On Online Media Kompas.Com And The New York Times

Suyanto Suyanto, Marshelli
article en

Abstract

The Gaza-Israel conflict, ongoing since 1948, reignited on October 7, 2023, with a series of rockets fired by Hamas into Israel. This study analyzes the framing of the Hamas-Israel conflict in online media, specifically Kompas.com and The New York Times, using Robert N. Entman's framing analysis, which includes defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and offering treatment recommendations. This qualitative research examines 20 news articles to explore how each outlet shapes perceptions of reality. Results reveal that Kompas.com emphasizes specific facts and figures, while The New York Times highlights emotional impacts. In diagnosing causes, Kompas.com connects the issue to the suffering of Palestinians, whereas The New York Times focuses on the broader Israel-Hamas conflict. For moral judgment, Kompas.com draws on historical context and direct impacts, while The New York Times condemns violence and stresses empathy for human suffering. Regarding treatment recommendations, Kompas.com rarely presents explicit solutions, while The New York Times advocates for international diplomacy and broader approaches.

MEDIUMVol. 13(1)
Riau University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.