Student Assessment in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Russia and Indonesia

This paper presents a comparative study of student assessment approaches in higher education institutions in Russia and Indonesia. The purpose of the study is to explore the methods, criteria, and frameworks used to evaluate student performance in both countries. The research methods used in this article include a descriptive qualitative approach and library research. The study employed a combination of document analysis and thematic coding to analyze the data, focusing on how educational policies, cultural contexts, and institutional practices shape assessment approaches. In Russia, the centralized governance system and long-standing academic traditions significantly influence assessment methods, while Indonesia’s decentralized educational structure and diverse cultural heritage lead to varied and flexible evaluation practices. The findings highlight both the strengths and weaknesses of each country’s assessment systems, emphasizing areas such as standardization, student engagement, and fairness in evaluations. The study concludes that while the two countries have distinct approaches, there are valuable insights each can gain from the other’s experiences. This research contributes to the global dialogue on improving student assessment practices by demonstrating how cultural and contextual factors must be considered to develop more effective and equitable evaluation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19109/m1drzx62
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student Assessment in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Russia and Indonesia

A. Rosyid Al-Atok, Sri Untari, Dimitruk Elena, Fitrotun Nafsiyah
Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Student Assessment in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Russia and Indonesia

A. Rosyid Al-Atok, Sri Untari, Dimitruk Elena, Fitrotun Nafsiyah
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of student assessment approaches in higher education institutions in Russia and Indonesia. The purpose of the study is to explore the methods, criteria, and frameworks used to evaluate student performance in both countries. The research methods used in this article include a descriptive qualitative approach and library research. The study employed a combination of document analysis and thematic coding to analyze the data, focusing on how educational policies, cultural contexts, and institutional practices shape assessment approaches. In Russia, the centralized governance system and long-standing academic traditions significantly influence assessment methods, while Indonesia’s decentralized educational structure and diverse cultural heritage lead to varied and flexible evaluation practices. The findings highlight both the strengths and weaknesses of each country’s assessment systems, emphasizing areas such as standardization, student engagement, and fairness in evaluations. The study concludes that while the two countries have distinct approaches, there are valuable insights each can gain from the other’s experiences. This research contributes to the global dialogue on improving student assessment practices by demonstrating how cultural and contextual factors must be considered to develop more effective and equitable evaluation systems.

Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan PengajaranVol. 11(02)
State University of Malang (ID), Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.