Evaluating generative AI for qualitative data extraction in community-based fisheries management literature

Uptake of AI tools in knowledge production processes is rapidly growing. In this pilot study, we explore the ability of generative AI tools to reliably extract qualitative data from a limited sample of peer-reviewed documents in the context of community-based fisheries management (CBFM) literature. Specifically, we evaluate the capacity of multiple AI tools to analyse 33 CBFM papers and extract relevant information for a systematic literature review, comparing the results to those of human reviewers. We address how well AI tools can discern the presence of relevant contextual data, whether the outputs of AI tools are comparable to human extractions, and whether the difficulty of question influences the performance of the extraction. While the AI tools we tested (GPT4-Turbo and Elicit) were not reliable in discerning the presence or absence of contextual data, at least one of the AI tools consistently returned responses that were on par with human reviewers. These results highlight the potential utility of AI tools in the extraction phase of evidence synthesis for supporting human-led reviews, while underscoring the ongoing need for human oversight. This exploratory investigation provides initial insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI in qualitative data extraction within the specific domain of CBFM, laying groundwork for future, more comprehensive evaluations across diverse fields and larger datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Evidence
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00362-9
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating generative AI for qualitative data extraction in community-based fisheries management literature

R Annand-Jones, Rowan Trebilco, Rebecca Shellock, Denis B. Karcher et al.
7 citations
Environmental Evidence
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
37.39
article

Evaluating generative AI for qualitative data extraction in community-based fisheries management literature

R Annand-Jones, Rowan Trebilco, Rebecca Shellock, Denis B. Karcher, Katherine May Ollerhead, Cécile Paris, James Duggan, Matthew Andreotta, Scott Spillias, Fabio Boschetti
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Uptake of AI tools in knowledge production processes is rapidly growing. In this pilot study, we explore the ability of generative AI tools to reliably extract qualitative data from a limited sample of peer-reviewed documents in the context of community-based fisheries management (CBFM) literature. Specifically, we evaluate the capacity of multiple AI tools to analyse 33 CBFM papers and extract relevant information for a systematic literature review, comparing the results to those of human reviewers. We address how well AI tools can discern the presence of relevant contextual data, whether the outputs of AI tools are comparable to human extractions, and whether the difficulty of question influences the performance of the extraction. While the AI tools we tested (GPT4-Turbo and Elicit) were not reliable in discerning the presence or absence of contextual data, at least one of the AI tools consistently returned responses that were on par with human reviewers. These results highlight the potential utility of AI tools in the extraction phase of evidence synthesis for supporting human-led reviews, while underscoring the ongoing need for human oversight. This exploratory investigation provides initial insights into the current capabilities and limitations of AI in qualitative data extraction within the specific domain of CBFM, laying groundwork for future, more comprehensive evaluations across diverse fields and larger datasets.

Environmental EvidenceVol. 14(1)
Australian National University (AU), CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere (AU), Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), Data61 (AU)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada, Centre for Marine Socioecology
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
37.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.