Thinking styles as a gateway to effective language education

Background. The relationship between thinking styles and language learning has long attracted the attention of scientists from various scientific fields. However, in recent years, this interest has become particularly relevant due to the development of the information space and multiculturalism. The need to revise traditional approaches to language learning is due to the qualitative changes occurring in the modern world. The purpose of the present study is to actualize the concepts of interdependence between studying and learning a foreign language and different thinking styles. Materials and Methods. In this work, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used, namely, the use of questionnaires to determine thinking styles, including those developed by R. Bramson and A. Harrison, followed by interviews for a deeper understanding of the experiences of students with different styles, interviews, focus groups, observation, in-depth testing. All of this made it possible to obtain a complete and balanced picture of the influence of thinking styles on English language learning. Results. The analysis showed that different thinking styles have a significant impact on foreign language learning. We found that different thinking styles, such as analytical, intuitive, creative, and others, have a significant impact on the choice and use of language tools. Differentiated methods for teaching professional English, based on accounting for individual thinking styles, were developed and tested. The proposed methods allow for the adaptation of educational materials to the cognitive characteristics of students. For learners with an analytical thinking style, tasks involving detailed analysis and systematization of information are most effective. Students with an intuitive thinking style can benefit from case studies and role-playing games that require quick decision-making. Creative students enjoy working on projects related to idea generation and unconventional solutions. Students with a logical thinking style tend to excel in tasks involving the construction of logical chains and data analysis. At the same time, it is important to combine various thinking styles in complex assignments, such as developing business cases where students with different thinking styles work in groups, allowing them to develop skills they may lack. The analysis of results demonstrates the necessity of considering individual thinking styles when studying a language and developing communication strategies. In the context of higher education, this topic allows for the development of more modern teaching methods based on the individual cognitive characteristics of students, which contributes to improving the effectiveness of the educational process. EDN: CASWVN

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Education and Psychology
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-4034-2025-16-1-686
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking styles as a gateway to effective language education

Elena A. Starodubtseva
1 citations
Russian Journal of Education and Psychology
Second Language Learning and Teaching
15.18
article

Thinking styles as a gateway to effective language education

Elena A. Starodubtseva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background. The relationship between thinking styles and language learning has long attracted the attention of scientists from various scientific fields. However, in recent years, this interest has become particularly relevant due to the development of the information space and multiculturalism. The need to revise traditional approaches to language learning is due to the qualitative changes occurring in the modern world. The purpose of the present study is to actualize the concepts of interdependence between studying and learning a foreign language and different thinking styles. Materials and Methods. In this work, a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used, namely, the use of questionnaires to determine thinking styles, including those developed by R. Bramson and A. Harrison, followed by interviews for a deeper understanding of the experiences of students with different styles, interviews, focus groups, observation, in-depth testing. All of this made it possible to obtain a complete and balanced picture of the influence of thinking styles on English language learning. Results. The analysis showed that different thinking styles have a significant impact on foreign language learning. We found that different thinking styles, such as analytical, intuitive, creative, and others, have a significant impact on the choice and use of language tools. Differentiated methods for teaching professional English, based on accounting for individual thinking styles, were developed and tested. The proposed methods allow for the adaptation of educational materials to the cognitive characteristics of students. For learners with an analytical thinking style, tasks involving detailed analysis and systematization of information are most effective. Students with an intuitive thinking style can benefit from case studies and role-playing games that require quick decision-making. Creative students enjoy working on projects related to idea generation and unconventional solutions. Students with a logical thinking style tend to excel in tasks involving the construction of logical chains and data analysis. At the same time, it is important to combine various thinking styles in complex assignments, such as developing business cases where students with different thinking styles work in groups, allowing them to develop skills they may lack. The analysis of results demonstrates the necessity of considering individual thinking styles when studying a language and developing communication strategies. In the context of higher education, this topic allows for the development of more modern teaching methods based on the individual cognitive characteristics of students, which contributes to improving the effectiveness of the educational process. EDN: CASWVN

Russian Journal of Education and PsychologyVol. 16(1)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.