The Prestige-Seeking Logic in China’s Foreign Policy

Abstract Prestige is a critical yet underexplored dimension of power politics in international relations. Despite its significance, its conceptual foundations and foreign policy implications have gone largely unexamined and remain insufficiently clear. Traditionally, prestige has been dismissed as an irrational pursuit or a catalyst for unnecessary conflict. However, this reductive perspective overlooks states’ varying motivations across diverse political contexts and the sophisticated means by which states seek and leverage prestige. In response to the fundamental question of why and how great powers perceive prestige, this article offers an analytical framework based on subjective and intersubjective dimensions to reconceptualise prestige and explore its impact on Chinese foreign policy. More specifically, the article identifies four distinct scenarios pertaining to perceptions of prestige based on the state’s and other actors’ evaluations of prestige dynamics, these perceptions being straightforwardly categorised as overrated, self-overrated, underrated, and self-underrated. Furthermore, it explores four primary approaches to understanding China’s evolving conceptions and pursuits of international prestige: learning, adaptation, creativity, and competition. This article aims to advance the conceptual understanding of prestige and provide a range of analytical tools for examining and evaluating the fundamental drivers of Chinese foreign policy in the current era of uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Chinese Journal of International Politics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poaf008
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prestige-Seeking Logic in China’s Foreign Policy

Guangyi Pan, Weizhun Mao
The Chinese Journal of International Politics
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Prestige-Seeking Logic in China’s Foreign Policy

Guangyi Pan, Weizhun Mao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prestige is a critical yet underexplored dimension of power politics in international relations. Despite its significance, its conceptual foundations and foreign policy implications have gone largely unexamined and remain insufficiently clear. Traditionally, prestige has been dismissed as an irrational pursuit or a catalyst for unnecessary conflict. However, this reductive perspective overlooks states’ varying motivations across diverse political contexts and the sophisticated means by which states seek and leverage prestige. In response to the fundamental question of why and how great powers perceive prestige, this article offers an analytical framework based on subjective and intersubjective dimensions to reconceptualise prestige and explore its impact on Chinese foreign policy. More specifically, the article identifies four distinct scenarios pertaining to perceptions of prestige based on the state’s and other actors’ evaluations of prestige dynamics, these perceptions being straightforwardly categorised as overrated, self-overrated, underrated, and self-underrated. Furthermore, it explores four primary approaches to understanding China’s evolving conceptions and pursuits of international prestige: learning, adaptation, creativity, and competition. This article aims to advance the conceptual understanding of prestige and provide a range of analytical tools for examining and evaluating the fundamental drivers of Chinese foreign policy in the current era of uncertainty.

The Chinese Journal of International PoliticsVol. 18(3)
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Nanjing University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.