Comparing Human-Delivered and Tech-Based Feedback: A Study of Student Perceptions and Performance

To learn effectively, students must receive constructive feedback, and the method of its delivery—whether by a person or through technology—can significantly impact learning. As schools increasingly adopt digital technologies, it is crucial to explore how trends in feedback influence students' perceptions and academic performance. This study examines the functions of both human-delivered and technological forms of feedback within a college setting. For this mixed-methods research, 60 undergraduate students received feedback from humans and from AI over one semester. The results found that the human feedback improved by 15.9%, ahead of the tech group by 5 percentage points in the end. The interview results showed students liked receiving human advice for its easy-to-understand truths and heartfelt encouragement and they also liked the quick responses from technology. The analysis proves that using different feedback channels can considerably improve academic performance and engagement at universities. The research was designed to study the effects of different types of feedback on students' results, how students judge their usefulness, how well they understand them, and how motivated they are. The researchers compared how two undergraduate students did with different feedback methods: some got feedback from instructors, and others had feedback through an AI system in the course platform. Students were evaluated on their progress with assignment grades given over a semester. Live interviews and group conversations were conducted to learn about students' experiences with each feedback tool. It was found that both types of feedback improved students' performances. On the other hand, participants said they respected the detailed and emotional nature of human-delivered feedback and liked how tech-based feedback was quick, reliable, and easy to use. Many learners said they wanted a system where feedback is a mix of what people and technology offer. The evidence suggests that a mixed approach may have the most outstanding value in teaching. More studies should examine large-scale blended feedback techniques and their impact on student learning and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71317/rjsa.003.03.0235
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Human-Delivered and Tech-Based Feedback: A Study of Student Perceptions and Performance

Rashid Hussain Abbasi, Dr Syeda Rakshanda Kaukab
2 citations
Research Journal for Social Affairs
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
article

Comparing Human-Delivered and Tech-Based Feedback: A Study of Student Perceptions and Performance

Rashid Hussain Abbasi, Dr Syeda Rakshanda Kaukab
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To learn effectively, students must receive constructive feedback, and the method of its delivery—whether by a person or through technology—can significantly impact learning. As schools increasingly adopt digital technologies, it is crucial to explore how trends in feedback influence students' perceptions and academic performance. This study examines the functions of both human-delivered and technological forms of feedback within a college setting. For this mixed-methods research, 60 undergraduate students received feedback from humans and from AI over one semester. The results found that the human feedback improved by 15.9%, ahead of the tech group by 5 percentage points in the end. The interview results showed students liked receiving human advice for its easy-to-understand truths and heartfelt encouragement and they also liked the quick responses from technology. The analysis proves that using different feedback channels can considerably improve academic performance and engagement at universities. The research was designed to study the effects of different types of feedback on students' results, how students judge their usefulness, how well they understand them, and how motivated they are. The researchers compared how two undergraduate students did with different feedback methods: some got feedback from instructors, and others had feedback through an AI system in the course platform. Students were evaluated on their progress with assignment grades given over a semester. Live interviews and group conversations were conducted to learn about students' experiences with each feedback tool. It was found that both types of feedback improved students' performances. On the other hand, participants said they respected the detailed and emotional nature of human-delivered feedback and liked how tech-based feedback was quick, reliable, and easy to use. Many learners said they wanted a system where feedback is a mix of what people and technology offer. The evidence suggests that a mixed approach may have the most outstanding value in teaching. More studies should examine large-scale blended feedback techniques and their impact on student learning and development.

Research Journal for Social AffairsVol. 3(3)
Greenwich University (PK), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.