Reconstructing historical catch trends of threatened sharks and rays based on fisher ecological knowledge

Small-scale fisheries often lack historical shark and ray catch information, hampering their management. We reconstructed historical catch trends and current fishing pressure by combining local ecological knowledge, satellite-based vessel counts, and a short-term landing-site survey. To test the effectiveness of this method, we focused on the Bijagós Archipelago (Guinea-Bissau, West Africa), where historical fisheries data are lacking. Benthic rays (stingrays [Dasyatidae] and butterfly rays [Gymnura spp.]), benthopelagic rays (duckbill eagle rays [Aetomylaeus bovinus] and cownose rays [Rhinoptera marginata]), guitarfish (Glaucostegus and Rhinobatos spp.), requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae), and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.) declined in abundance by 81.5-96.7% (species dependent) from 1960 to 2020. Fishing effort increased annually: fishing trip duration by 42.0% (SE 3.4), numbers of fishing vessels at sea as perceived by fishers by 36.3% (1.0) (1960-2020), and number of vessels by 12.0% (1.1) (2007-2022). We estimated that in 2020, fishing vessels collectively captured 61-264 sharks and 522-2194 rays per day in the archipelago, depending on the proportion of the fishing fleet that was active (i.e., low fleet activity of 18% and high fleet activity of 80%). We advocate for reducing shark and ray catches by regulating fleet size, reinforcing boundaries of protected areas, and collecting fisher-dependent information on shark and ray landings to safeguard these vulnerable species and coastal livelihoods. We demonstrated the effectiveness of using this 3-pronged approach to provide baseline data on shark fisheries, a common challenge in areas with small-scale fisheries and limited research capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70059
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconstructing historical catch trends of threatened sharks and rays based on fisher ecological knowledge

Laura L. Govers, Thije J. Zuidewind, Rima W. Jabado, Matthew Bjerregaard Walsh et al.
4 citations
Conservation Biology
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
9.25
article

Reconstructing historical catch trends of threatened sharks and rays based on fisher ecological knowledge

Laura L. Govers, Thije J. Zuidewind, Rima W. Jabado, Matthew Bjerregaard Walsh, Han Olff, Karin de Boer, Pierre Campredon, Assana Camará, Diosnes Manuel Nonque, Nadia Hijner, Aissa Regalla, Iça Barry, Samuel Ledo Pontes, Guido Leurs, Lilísio Dos Santos, Benja Blaschke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries often lack historical shark and ray catch information, hampering their management. We reconstructed historical catch trends and current fishing pressure by combining local ecological knowledge, satellite-based vessel counts, and a short-term landing-site survey. To test the effectiveness of this method, we focused on the Bijagós Archipelago (Guinea-Bissau, West Africa), where historical fisheries data are lacking. Benthic rays (stingrays [Dasyatidae] and butterfly rays [Gymnura spp.]), benthopelagic rays (duckbill eagle rays [Aetomylaeus bovinus] and cownose rays [Rhinoptera marginata]), guitarfish (Glaucostegus and Rhinobatos spp.), requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae), and hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.) declined in abundance by 81.5-96.7% (species dependent) from 1960 to 2020. Fishing effort increased annually: fishing trip duration by 42.0% (SE 3.4), numbers of fishing vessels at sea as perceived by fishers by 36.3% (1.0) (1960-2020), and number of vessels by 12.0% (1.1) (2007-2022). We estimated that in 2020, fishing vessels collectively captured 61-264 sharks and 522-2194 rays per day in the archipelago, depending on the proportion of the fishing fleet that was active (i.e., low fleet activity of 18% and high fleet activity of 80%). We advocate for reducing shark and ray catches by regulating fleet size, reinforcing boundaries of protected areas, and collecting fisher-dependent information on shark and ray landings to safeguard these vulnerable species and coastal livelihoods. We demonstrated the effectiveness of using this 3-pronged approach to provide baseline data on shark fisheries, a common challenge in areas with small-scale fisheries and limited research capacity.

Conservation BiologyVol. 39(5)
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Universidade dos Açores (PT), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), University of Groningen (NL), Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisa (GW), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), Elasmo Project (AE), James Cook University (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
MAVA Foundation, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
9.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.