Pro-Copyright, Pro-AI: The Power of Collective Licensing

The aim of this Article is to showcase the emerging AI licensing solutions pioneered by RROs and to explore how these frameworks address the challenges posed by AI’s reliance on copyrighted works. The discussion begins with a primer on the structure and operation of collective management frameworks, highlighting their effectiveness in managing rights for secondary uses. Following this, the Article examines the necessity of licensing in the AI context, emphasizing why exceptions and limitations under current copyright regimes are insufficient to adequately address the complexities of AI training. This section underscores the limitations of existing legal frameworks and the potential harm to rightsholders if AI systems continue to use copyrighted works without appropriate permissions or compensation. Finally, the Article presents an analysis of the emerging licensing solutions tailored to AI, illustrating how these initiatives by RROs are not only meeting the demands of the AI market but are also paving the way for sustainable and equitable practices at the intersection of copyright and technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v48i4.13923
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pro-Copyright, Pro-AI: The Power of Collective Licensing

Anita Huss-Ekerhult, Antonios Baris
The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Pro-Copyright, Pro-AI: The Power of Collective Licensing

Anita Huss-Ekerhult, Antonios Baris
article en

Abstract

The aim of this Article is to showcase the emerging AI licensing solutions pioneered by RROs and to explore how these frameworks address the challenges posed by AI’s reliance on copyrighted works. The discussion begins with a primer on the structure and operation of collective management frameworks, highlighting their effectiveness in managing rights for secondary uses. Following this, the Article examines the necessity of licensing in the AI context, emphasizing why exceptions and limitations under current copyright regimes are insufficient to adequately address the complexities of AI training. This section underscores the limitations of existing legal frameworks and the potential harm to rightsholders if AI systems continue to use copyrighted works without appropriate permissions or compensation. Finally, the Article presents an analysis of the emerging licensing solutions tailored to AI, illustrating how these initiatives by RROs are not only meeting the demands of the AI market but are also paving the way for sustainable and equitable practices at the intersection of copyright and technology.

The Columbia Journal of Law & the ArtsVol. 48(4)
International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pro-Copyright, Pro-AI: The Power of Collective Licensing — Anita Huss-Ekerhult, Antonios Baris · The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS