The echo of human bias in AI refinement

The Echo of Human Bias in AI Refinement explores how human prejudices infiltrate Artificial Intelligence systems throughout their development lifecycle. From initial training data embedded with societal inequalities to refinement processes that encode evaluator preferences, bias enters AI through multiple channels. The article traces this journey through four stages: data collection, human feedback mechanisms, fine-tuning processes, and iterative development. Real-world consequences manifest in financial services, navigation systems, and healthcare, where algorithmic decision-making can amplify existing disparities. Mitigation strategies include implementing rigorous bias detection throughout development, diversifying data and feedback sources, establishing transparent human oversight, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. By understanding these mechanisms, we can develop AI systems that better serve all of humanity rather than perpetuating historical inequities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2025.15.2.0819
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The echo of human bias in AI refinement

Andrew A. Sama
World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The echo of human bias in AI refinement

Andrew A. Sama
article en

Abstract

The Echo of Human Bias in AI Refinement explores how human prejudices infiltrate Artificial Intelligence systems throughout their development lifecycle. From initial training data embedded with societal inequalities to refinement processes that encode evaluator preferences, bias enters AI through multiple channels. The article traces this journey through four stages: data collection, human feedback mechanisms, fine-tuning processes, and iterative development. Real-world consequences manifest in financial services, navigation systems, and healthcare, where algorithmic decision-making can amplify existing disparities. Mitigation strategies include implementing rigorous bias detection throughout development, diversifying data and feedback sources, establishing transparent human oversight, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. By understanding these mechanisms, we can develop AI systems that better serve all of humanity rather than perpetuating historical inequities.

World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and SciencesVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The echo of human bias in AI refinement — Andrew A. Sama · World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS