Are tailored primary care services for social inclusion good value for money? A health economics evaluation with Monte-Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis comparing tailored social inclusion primary care services to mainstream primary care servi

This study found that investment in SIPC services, that can meet the needs of a marginalised population, represents good value for money from the perspective of the publicly funded health service. The findings are valuable in supporting stakeholders, policy-makers, and budget holders to make evidence-informed equitable decisions for optimal funding allocation within health and social services.