Evaluation of an automated on-farm device to identify groups of bacteria associated with clinical mastitis on a United States dairy farm

Recent studies suggest that selectively treating non-severe clinical mastitis during lactation, guided by on-farm culture, can be prudent. However, on-farm culture presents logistical challenges. This study investigated Mastatest’s® (MT; Masta­plex, New Zealand) ability to identify broad groups of patho­gens in clinical mastitis milk samples compared to laboratory culture and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (LC+M) on one U.S. dairy farm. Milk samples from quarters with clinical mastitis were col­lected on a dairy farm located in Colorado (n = 162). The test’s ability to identify groups of pathogens was assessed against LC+M (reference method) using contingency tables. Test char­acteristics (sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], positive predictive value and negative predictive value) and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Agreement was assessed using the Kappa statistic. Prevalences (0.20-0.60) for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were used to estimate predictive values. Before analysis, contaminated or missing samples in either MT or LC+M were excluded (n = 36). Our findings indi­cated moderate to substantial agreement, with Kappa values ranging from 0.53 to 0.66. For Gram-positive pathogens, Se and Sp estimates, and their 95% confidence intervals were: Se: 0.83 (0.70, 0.92), Sp: 0.81 (0.70, 0.89), and for Gram-negative bac­teria (Se: 0.73 [0.50, 0.89], Sp: 0.93 [0.87, 0.97]). Negative predic­tive value remained above 0.70 across different prevalence sce­narios, particularly where values exceeded 0.90 for prevalences below 0.30. Our findings suggest MT is a suitable technology for on-farm detection of mastitis pathogens commonly identified on U.S. dairy farms in clinical mastitis milk samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bovine Practitioner
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/bpj20259258
Primary Topic
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an automated on-farm device to identify groups of bacteria associated with clinical mastitis on a United States dairy farm

L.S. Caixeta, Olaf Bork, M.L. Stangaferro, D.V. Nydam et al.
The Bovine Practitioner
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
article

Evaluation of an automated on-farm device to identify groups of bacteria associated with clinical mastitis on a United States dairy farm

L.S. Caixeta, Olaf Bork, M.L. Stangaferro, D.V. Nydam, Susan Saila, F. Peña-Mosca, M.J. Thomas, Rita Cuoto-Serrenho
article en

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that selectively treating non-severe clinical mastitis during lactation, guided by on-farm culture, can be prudent. However, on-farm culture presents logistical challenges. This study investigated Mastatest’s® (MT; Masta­plex, New Zealand) ability to identify broad groups of patho­gens in clinical mastitis milk samples compared to laboratory culture and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (LC+M) on one U.S. dairy farm. Milk samples from quarters with clinical mastitis were col­lected on a dairy farm located in Colorado (n = 162). The test’s ability to identify groups of pathogens was assessed against LC+M (reference method) using contingency tables. Test char­acteristics (sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], positive predictive value and negative predictive value) and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Agreement was assessed using the Kappa statistic. Prevalences (0.20-0.60) for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria were used to estimate predictive values. Before analysis, contaminated or missing samples in either MT or LC+M were excluded (n = 36). Our findings indi­cated moderate to substantial agreement, with Kappa values ranging from 0.53 to 0.66. For Gram-positive pathogens, Se and Sp estimates, and their 95% confidence intervals were: Se: 0.83 (0.70, 0.92), Sp: 0.81 (0.70, 0.89), and for Gram-negative bac­teria (Se: 0.73 [0.50, 0.89], Sp: 0.93 [0.87, 0.97]). Negative predic­tive value remained above 0.70 across different prevalence sce­narios, particularly where values exceeded 0.90 for prevalences below 0.30. Our findings suggest MT is a suitable technology for on-farm detection of mastitis pathogens commonly identified on U.S. dairy farms in clinical mastitis milk samples.

The Bovine PractitionerVol. 59(2)
University of Minnesota (US), Cornell University (US), Dairy Management (US), University of Guelph (CA), University of Otago (NZ)
David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.