Microstructure and Hardness of Ti-6242 Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion and Laser Powder Bed Fusion Methods

Introduction and Objectives: Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo (Ti6242) alloy is a near-alpha titanium alloy widely used in biomedical, automobile, and aviation industries, known for having a high service temperature. The objectives of this study are to compare the electron beam melting and selected laser melting techniques in terms of the microstructure and hardness developed in Ti6242 alloy.Materials and Methods: Microstructure and hardness of Ti6242 alloy samples produced by the two-powder bed fusion techniques were analyzed using optical and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, and Vickers hardness test.Results: The porosity levels in both samples were within the acceptable ranges for powder bed fusion processes. The solidified microstructure of laser powder bed fusion samples consisted of columnar β grains with martensitic α' phase, and that of electron beam powder bed fusion sample consisted of lamellar α+β phases with Widmanstätten and basketweave morphology and α colonies. Williamson-Hall plots revealed higher lattice microstrain in the laser powder bed fusion process. The average hardness values of electron beam powder bed fusion and laser powder bed fusion samples were approximately 408 HV and 401 HV.Conclusion: Both powder bed fusion techniques employed were capable of producing samples of acceptable porosity levels. The solidified microstructures of the two techniques were somewhat different due to different heating and cooling histories experienced. The electron beam powder bed fusion sample enjoyed smaller lattice microstrain and higher hardness than the laser beam powder bed fusion sample. Hardness of both samples was higher than those of the conventionally fabricated components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mavādd-i pīshraftah dar muhandisī
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47176/jame.44.2.1090
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microstructure and Hardness of Ti-6242 Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion and Laser Powder Bed Fusion Methods

Manuela Galati, Abdollah Saboori, Behzad Niroumand, Amin Azadi et al.
Mavādd-i pīshraftah dar muhandisī
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Microstructure and Hardness of Ti-6242 Alloy Fabricated by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion and Laser Powder Bed Fusion Methods

Manuela Galati, Abdollah Saboori, Behzad Niroumand, Amin Azadi, Amir Hossein Emami Ghalehghasemi
article en

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo (Ti6242) alloy is a near-alpha titanium alloy widely used in biomedical, automobile, and aviation industries, known for having a high service temperature. The objectives of this study are to compare the electron beam melting and selected laser melting techniques in terms of the microstructure and hardness developed in Ti6242 alloy.Materials and Methods: Microstructure and hardness of Ti6242 alloy samples produced by the two-powder bed fusion techniques were analyzed using optical and scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry, and Vickers hardness test.Results: The porosity levels in both samples were within the acceptable ranges for powder bed fusion processes. The solidified microstructure of laser powder bed fusion samples consisted of columnar β grains with martensitic α' phase, and that of electron beam powder bed fusion sample consisted of lamellar α+β phases with Widmanstätten and basketweave morphology and α colonies. Williamson-Hall plots revealed higher lattice microstrain in the laser powder bed fusion process. The average hardness values of electron beam powder bed fusion and laser powder bed fusion samples were approximately 408 HV and 401 HV.Conclusion: Both powder bed fusion techniques employed were capable of producing samples of acceptable porosity levels. The solidified microstructures of the two techniques were somewhat different due to different heating and cooling histories experienced. The electron beam powder bed fusion sample enjoyed smaller lattice microstrain and higher hardness than the laser beam powder bed fusion sample. Hardness of both samples was higher than those of the conventionally fabricated components.

Mavādd-i pīshraftah dar muhandisīVol. 44(2)
Isfahan University of Technology (IR), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.