Accurate Prediction of Hybrid Nanofluids Viscosity: A Comparison of Soft Computational Approaches, Empirical, and Theoretical Models

Abstract Hybrid nanofluids exhibit enhanced thermal properties compared to conventional nanofluids. Viscosity, critical for assessing heat transfer efficiency, influences pressure drop and pumping power. This study models hybrid nanofluid viscosity using Radial Basis Function (RBF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and a Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS). A dataset of 584 viscosity data points is utilized. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Farmland Fertility Algorithm (FFA) are employed to train the RBF, while the MLP utilized Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and Levenberg‐Marquardt (LM) algorithms. The CMIS is created by integrating MLP‐BR, RBF‐FFA, and RBF‐PSO networks. The AAPRE values for RBF‐PSO, RBF‐FFA, MLP‐LM, MLP‐SCG, MLP‐BR, and CMIS models are 1.7464, 1.6647, 2.6851, 2.1889, 2.1792, and 1.519, respectively. The R 2 values are 0.9689, 0.9394, 0.4794, 0.9727, 0.9404, and 0.9688, respectively, which indicates that the CMIS model with the lowest Average Absolute Percent Relative Error (AAPRE) and the highest Determination Coefficient (R 2 ) value is the most accurate model and outperforms other models in estimating viscosity, demonstrating greater accuracy than empirical and theoretical models. Sensitivity analysis showed that temperature has a significant positive impact on viscosity, while nanoparticle size has a negative effect. The CMIS model is reliable for predicting nanofluid viscosity, exhibiting a broad application range and minimal outlier data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Theory and Simulations
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202401323
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accurate Prediction of Hybrid Nanofluids Viscosity: A Comparison of Soft Computational Approaches, Empirical, and Theoretical Models

Mohammad Haji‐Savameri, Hossein Ghadery‐Fahliyany, Majid Mohammadi, Mehrorang Ghaedi et al.
1 citations
Advanced Theory and Simulations
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
0.67
article

Accurate Prediction of Hybrid Nanofluids Viscosity: A Comparison of Soft Computational Approaches, Empirical, and Theoretical Models

Mohammad Haji‐Savameri, Hossein Ghadery‐Fahliyany, Majid Mohammadi, Mehrorang Ghaedi, Abdolhossein Hemmati‐Sarapardeh, Saeed Jafari, Mahin Schaffie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hybrid nanofluids exhibit enhanced thermal properties compared to conventional nanofluids. Viscosity, critical for assessing heat transfer efficiency, influences pressure drop and pumping power. This study models hybrid nanofluid viscosity using Radial Basis Function (RBF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and a Committee Machine Intelligent System (CMIS). A dataset of 584 viscosity data points is utilized. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Farmland Fertility Algorithm (FFA) are employed to train the RBF, while the MLP utilized Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG), Bayesian Regularization (BR), and Levenberg‐Marquardt (LM) algorithms. The CMIS is created by integrating MLP‐BR, RBF‐FFA, and RBF‐PSO networks. The AAPRE values for RBF‐PSO, RBF‐FFA, MLP‐LM, MLP‐SCG, MLP‐BR, and CMIS models are 1.7464, 1.6647, 2.6851, 2.1889, 2.1792, and 1.519, respectively. The R 2 values are 0.9689, 0.9394, 0.4794, 0.9727, 0.9404, and 0.9688, respectively, which indicates that the CMIS model with the lowest Average Absolute Percent Relative Error (AAPRE) and the highest Determination Coefficient (R 2 ) value is the most accurate model and outperforms other models in estimating viscosity, demonstrating greater accuracy than empirical and theoretical models. Sensitivity analysis showed that temperature has a significant positive impact on viscosity, while nanoparticle size has a negative effect. The CMIS model is reliable for predicting nanofluid viscosity, exhibiting a broad application range and minimal outlier data.

Advanced Theory and SimulationsVol. 8(10)
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR), Shiraz University (IR), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Yasouj University (IR), Qom University of Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.