A Roadmap Toward Building Trust in AI Environment: Research Agenda

This paper explores the critical interplay between trust in AI technology and trust in its deployment, focusing on the gaps in interpersonal trust often overlooked in AI adoption. While AI enhances operational efficiency and decision-making, it struggles to replicate the emotional and psychological foundations of human trust. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature, the study highlights three trust dimensions—technological, organizational, and user-centric—and their misalignment, which fuels skepticism about AI reliability and ethical behavior. Despite AI's potential to transform industries, trust deficits persist due to concerns about transparency, accountability, and the emotional resonance of AI. The findings underscore that trust in AI must evolve as a complementary construct, bridging human and machine interactions without displacing interpersonal trust. The study proposes a framework emphasizing cultural and organizational adaptation, regulatory oversight, and user engagement to foster a balanced, sustainable AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of healthcare and medical research
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14738/bjhmr.1201.18209
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Roadmap Toward Building Trust in AI Environment: Research Agenda

Ik‐Whan G. Kwon, Sung‐Ho Kim
British journal of healthcare and medical research
BIM and Construction Integration
article

A Roadmap Toward Building Trust in AI Environment: Research Agenda

Ik‐Whan G. Kwon, Sung‐Ho Kim
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the critical interplay between trust in AI technology and trust in its deployment, focusing on the gaps in interpersonal trust often overlooked in AI adoption. While AI enhances operational efficiency and decision-making, it struggles to replicate the emotional and psychological foundations of human trust. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature, the study highlights three trust dimensions—technological, organizational, and user-centric—and their misalignment, which fuels skepticism about AI reliability and ethical behavior. Despite AI's potential to transform industries, trust deficits persist due to concerns about transparency, accountability, and the emotional resonance of AI. The findings underscore that trust in AI must evolve as a complementary construct, bridging human and machine interactions without displacing interpersonal trust. The study proposes a framework emphasizing cultural and organizational adaptation, regulatory oversight, and user engagement to foster a balanced, sustainable AI.

British journal of healthcare and medical researchVol. 12(01)
Cheongju University (KR), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Roadmap Toward Building Trust in AI Environment: Research Agenda — Ik‐Whan G. Kwon, Sung‐Ho Kim · British journal of healthcare and medical research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS