Automated Data Processing Workflows for Non‐Expert Users of NMR Facilities

The cost and complexity of modern NMR spectrometers have led to the establishment of centralized, ultrahigh-field facilities with multiple instruments that benefit from shared infrastructure and expertise. Many users have no NMR background, as they come from diverse scientific fields. This requires either heavy involvement of NMR experts in the data treatment or that data processing workflows are made user-friendly, robust, and amenable to automation. This paper discusses how at the Danish Center for Ultrahigh Field NMR Spectroscopy at Aarhus University we develop automated-or guided-data processing workflows to serve the broad community of users of the Center. By providing consistency checks in the algorithms and reporting intermediate results, our data analysis tools raise flags if they are-or are likely-failing. We illustrate this approach with two examples: an automated quantitative lipidomics workflow and a semi-automated multi-exponential relaxation analysis in food matrices. The lipidomics workflow uses <sup>1</sup>H-<sup>31</sup>P TOCSY spectra, database matching, and quantitative <sup>31</sup>P measurements, while color-coded reliability labels highlight potential pitfalls. The multi-exponential relaxation analysis automatically determines an appropriate value for the regularization parameter via the L-curve. Both examples show how guided automation reduces expert supervision and accelerates data processing. We plan to further refine these automated workflows, share our software openly, and explore additional application areas to foster a semi-automated NMR facility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5540
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Data Processing Workflows for Non‐Expert Users of NMR Facilities

Armin Afrough, Thomas Vosegaard, Maria Pérez‐Mendigorri
4 citations
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.22
article

Automated Data Processing Workflows for Non‐Expert Users of NMR Facilities

Armin Afrough, Thomas Vosegaard, Maria Pérez‐Mendigorri
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The cost and complexity of modern NMR spectrometers have led to the establishment of centralized, ultrahigh-field facilities with multiple instruments that benefit from shared infrastructure and expertise. Many users have no NMR background, as they come from diverse scientific fields. This requires either heavy involvement of NMR experts in the data treatment or that data processing workflows are made user-friendly, robust, and amenable to automation. This paper discusses how at the Danish Center for Ultrahigh Field NMR Spectroscopy at Aarhus University we develop automated-or guided-data processing workflows to serve the broad community of users of the Center. By providing consistency checks in the algorithms and reporting intermediate results, our data analysis tools raise flags if they are-or are likely-failing. We illustrate this approach with two examples: an automated quantitative lipidomics workflow and a semi-automated multi-exponential relaxation analysis in food matrices. The lipidomics workflow uses <sup>1</sup>H-<sup>31</sup>P TOCSY spectra, database matching, and quantitative <sup>31</sup>P measurements, while color-coded reliability labels highlight potential pitfalls. The multi-exponential relaxation analysis automatically determines an appropriate value for the regularization parameter via the L-curve. Both examples show how guided automation reduces expert supervision and accelerates data processing. We plan to further refine these automated workflows, share our software openly, and explore additional application areas to foster a semi-automated NMR facility.

Magnetic Resonance in ChemistryVol. 63(8)
Aarhus University (DK)
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Data Processing Workflows for Non‐Expert Users of NMR Facilities — Armin Afrough, Thomas Vosegaard, et al. · Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS