Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the <scp>NPU</scp>‐Reward Task

Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychophysiology
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70083
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU‐Reward Task

Annmarie MacNamara, Ha Jeong Park
Psychophysiology
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the NPU‐Reward Task

Annmarie MacNamara, Ha Jeong Park
article en

Abstract

Defensive reactivity (startle) is increased during anticipation of temporally unpredictable (> predictable) threat. Startle also seems to be potentiated during reward anticipation, yet how this is affected by temporal unpredictability had not previously been examined. In addition to unpredictability, between-subject differences in how people prepare for and attempt to regulate their response to motivationally salient events might affect defensive reactivity in response to reward. Specifically, contrast avoidance is the self-reported tendency to avoid shifts in emotion, and although typically studied in relation to negative events, it is theorized to apply to positive events, which can set the stage for greater downward shifts in emotion. We used a novel paradigm-the no (N) reward, predictable (P) reward, and unpredictable (U) reward task-to examine the effects of temporal unpredictability and individual differences in contrast avoidance on startle eyeblink and EEG component, the reward positivity (RewP) during anticipation and receipt of rewarding feedback. Sixty-five participants performed the NPU-reward task during EEG and EMG data collection and completed the Contrast Avoidance Questionnaire (Worry version). Startle eyeblinks were potentiated during P versus N reward cues only (i.e., not U > N). By contrast, the RewP was larger for both P and U compared to N reward feedback. In addition, individuals with greater contrast avoidance had larger startle eyeblinks during P compared to U reward inter-stimulus intervals. Therefore, the timing of reward delivery may be important in modulating anticipatory defensive reflexes, and contrast avoidance may interfere with reductions in defense reactivity following rewarding feedback.

PsychophysiologyVol. 62(6)
Texas A&M University (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wait for It: Defensive Reactivity and Individual Differences in Contrast Avoidance in the <scp>NPU</scp>‐Reward Task — Annmarie MacNamara, Ha Jeong Park · Psychophysiology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS