The Physical and Psychological Effects of Kinesiotaping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

As no other investigators have holistically addressed kinesiotaping (KT) effects on physical and psychological measures in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our aim in the present study was to investigate the effects of KT application on pain, flexibility, function, back awareness, fear-avoidance, anxiety, and depression in patients with CLBP. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial with 52 patients with CLBP who were randomized to either or an electrotherapy (ET) group (<i>n</i> = 26) or a KT + ET group (<i>n</i> = 26). The ET group received only conventional electrophysical interventions for two weeks, while the KT + ET group received kinesiotaping plus the electro-physical interventions. At baseline, after the second week (post-treatment), and at an eighth-week follow-up, participants were given the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for self-reported pain, the Fremantle Low Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ), the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTST), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Modified Schober Test (mST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). The KT + ET group showed greater improvement than the ET group on the VAS, TUG, FTST, FreBAQ, and FABQ and was significantly improved at both the second and eighth weeks (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective function (RMDQ) score of the KT group was better at the eighth week (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups on the mST, HADS-D, and HADS-A (<i>p</i> > .05). However, both the KT + ET and ET groups showed significant improvement on the HADS-D and HAD-S-A (<i>p</i> < .05). These results show that the KT application provided additional benefits relative to ET alone in participants' perceived pain, and their objective and subjective functioning, low back awareness, and fear avoidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251347481
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Physical and Psychological Effects of Kinesiotaping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Fatih Özden, Özgür Karaman, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş, Emine Aslan Telci
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The Physical and Psychological Effects of Kinesiotaping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Fatih Özden, Özgür Karaman, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş, Emine Aslan Telci
article en

Abstract

As no other investigators have holistically addressed kinesiotaping (KT) effects on physical and psychological measures in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our aim in the present study was to investigate the effects of KT application on pain, flexibility, function, back awareness, fear-avoidance, anxiety, and depression in patients with CLBP. We conducted a single-blind, randomized controlled trial with 52 patients with CLBP who were randomized to either or an electrotherapy (ET) group (<i>n</i> = 26) or a KT + ET group (<i>n</i> = 26). The ET group received only conventional electrophysical interventions for two weeks, while the KT + ET group received kinesiotaping plus the electro-physical interventions. At baseline, after the second week (post-treatment), and at an eighth-week follow-up, participants were given the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for self-reported pain, the Fremantle Low Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ), the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTST), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Modified Schober Test (mST), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). The KT + ET group showed greater improvement than the ET group on the VAS, TUG, FTST, FreBAQ, and FABQ and was significantly improved at both the second and eighth weeks (<i>p</i> < .05). The subjective function (RMDQ) score of the KT group was better at the eighth week (<i>p</i> < .05). There was no significant difference between the groups on the mST, HADS-D, and HADS-A (<i>p</i> > .05). However, both the KT + ET and ET groups showed significant improvement on the HADS-D and HAD-S-A (<i>p</i> < .05). These results show that the KT application provided additional benefits relative to ET alone in participants' perceived pain, and their objective and subjective functioning, low back awareness, and fear avoidance.

Perceptual and Motor SkillsVol. 132(6)
Pamukkale University (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.