Reimagining the Role of Communication in Medical Consensus to Address Medical Mistrust and Disinformation

Medical consensus is a critical element in deriving and substantiating evidence-based approaches to guide patient communication and care delivery. However, in recent years, mistrust in medicine—and in science more broadly—has deepened, driven in part by the recent politicization of public health guidance and the spread of disinformation, as well as by historically siloed and opaque public engagement practices. There has been limited critical analysis of the social processes that shape medical consensus and how these processes intersect with contemporary public attitudes and guideline adherence. Here, we discuss the intricate sociological history of medical consensus-making and its broad and deepening challenges. We further propose pathways toward more inclusive, transparent, and effective consensus-building practices, providing recommendations for a new Public Medicine Consensus framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Communication
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251342228
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining the Role of Communication in Medical Consensus to Address Medical Mistrust and Disinformation

Sugy Choi, David Scales, Jerel M. Ezell
1 links
Science Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Reimagining the Role of Communication in Medical Consensus to Address Medical Mistrust and Disinformation

Sugy Choi, David Scales, Jerel M. Ezell
article en

Abstract

Medical consensus is a critical element in deriving and substantiating evidence-based approaches to guide patient communication and care delivery. However, in recent years, mistrust in medicine—and in science more broadly—has deepened, driven in part by the recent politicization of public health guidance and the spread of disinformation, as well as by historically siloed and opaque public engagement practices. There has been limited critical analysis of the social processes that shape medical consensus and how these processes intersect with contemporary public attitudes and guideline adherence. Here, we discuss the intricate sociological history of medical consensus-making and its broad and deepening challenges. We further propose pathways toward more inclusive, transparent, and effective consensus-building practices, providing recommendations for a new Public Medicine Consensus framework.

Science Communication
Cornell University (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), New York University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reimagining the Role of Communication in Medical Consensus to Address Medical Mistrust and Disinformation — Sugy Choi, David Scales, et al. · Science Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS