Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation

The gender pay gap (GPG) has come to symbolise persistent inequalities women face at work. In response, governments are increasingly adopting regulation that requires employers to disclose gendered differences in pay, although often without compelling employers to address these pay gaps. An important question therefore arises over the role and capacity of non-state actors operating as regulatory intermediaries to hold employers accountable for closing GPGs. We use Australia as a case study, where a recent government-led review of the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 provides insight into intermediaries’ perspectives on GPG disclosure regulation. Drawing on 121 submissions to this legislative review as well as 14 in-depth qualitative interviews, we provide novel insights to identify the cast of regulatory intermediaries, their means of influence and, importantly, the legislative features that enable them to influence employer action to close the GPG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856251337198
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation

Jananie William, Sue Curtis, Andreas Pekarek, Anna von Reibnitz et al.
Journal of Industrial Relations
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation

Jananie William, Sue Curtis, Andreas Pekarek, Anna von Reibnitz, Miriam Glennie
article en

Abstract

The gender pay gap (GPG) has come to symbolise persistent inequalities women face at work. In response, governments are increasingly adopting regulation that requires employers to disclose gendered differences in pay, although often without compelling employers to address these pay gaps. An important question therefore arises over the role and capacity of non-state actors operating as regulatory intermediaries to hold employers accountable for closing GPGs. We use Australia as a case study, where a recent government-led review of the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 provides insight into intermediaries’ perspectives on GPG disclosure regulation. Drawing on 121 submissions to this legislative review as well as 14 in-depth qualitative interviews, we provide novel insights to identify the cast of regulatory intermediaries, their means of influence and, importantly, the legislative features that enable them to influence employer action to close the GPG.

Journal of Industrial RelationsVol. 68(1)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU)
United Nations Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation — Jananie William, Sue Curtis, et al. · Journal of Industrial Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS