Unveiling student sentiment dynamics toward <scp>AI</scp>‐based education through statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract This study explores the multifaceted dynamics of student sentiment towards artificial intelligence (AI)‐based education by integrating sentiment analysis techniques with statistical methods, including Monte Carlo simulations and decision tree modelling, alongside qualitative grounded theory analysis. Data were collected from 540 university students, whose responses to open‐ended and scale‐based questions were systematically analysed to capture the nuances of their perceptions regarding the transformative potential and inherent challenges of AI in educational settings. Quantitatively, sentiment scores were derived using GPT‐4, categorised into positive, neutral and negative bins, and further examined through descriptive statistics, one‐way ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests. Monte Carlo simulations provided a resilient estimation of sentiment distributions, while decision tree analysis elucidated key demographic and attitudinal predictors of AI adoption, particularly highlighting the roles of age and ethical perceptions. Qualitatively, grounded theory was employed to extract emergent themes that reflect both the enthusiasm for personalised, efficient learning and the concerns over ethical dilemmas, social isolation and diminished teacher–student interactions. The findings reveal a dual‐edged view of AI‐based education, while a majority of students acknowledge its advantages for enhancing learning efficiency and access to information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Educational Research Journal
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4188
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling student sentiment dynamics toward AI‐based education through statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation

Hurinur Çelik, Ercümend Ersanlı, Volkan Duran
1 citations
British Educational Research Journal
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
article

Unveiling student sentiment dynamics toward AI‐based education through statistical analysis and Monte Carlo simulation

Hurinur Çelik, Ercümend Ersanlı, Volkan Duran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the multifaceted dynamics of student sentiment towards artificial intelligence (AI)‐based education by integrating sentiment analysis techniques with statistical methods, including Monte Carlo simulations and decision tree modelling, alongside qualitative grounded theory analysis. Data were collected from 540 university students, whose responses to open‐ended and scale‐based questions were systematically analysed to capture the nuances of their perceptions regarding the transformative potential and inherent challenges of AI in educational settings. Quantitatively, sentiment scores were derived using GPT‐4, categorised into positive, neutral and negative bins, and further examined through descriptive statistics, one‐way ANOVA and Scheffé post hoc tests. Monte Carlo simulations provided a resilient estimation of sentiment distributions, while decision tree analysis elucidated key demographic and attitudinal predictors of AI adoption, particularly highlighting the roles of age and ethical perceptions. Qualitatively, grounded theory was employed to extract emergent themes that reflect both the enthusiasm for personalised, efficient learning and the concerns over ethical dilemmas, social isolation and diminished teacher–student interactions. The findings reveal a dual‐edged view of AI‐based education, while a majority of students acknowledge its advantages for enhancing learning efficiency and access to information.

British Educational Research Journal
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.