Negotiating Relationships Within Multispecies Families: Analysing Dilemmas on Humanisation of the Bond

The literature indicates that companions are frequently considered part of our families.But, what does it mean?This article examines how the relationship between humans and nonhuman animals is defined within the family organization.We organized three online focus groups interviews, and the analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis.The relationships with animals seemed to be based on four themes: (1) external limits (legal, moral, and biological) that frame the human-animal relationship; (2) participants' perception of their role within the relationship (e.g.caregivers); (3) characteristics perceived in the animal that determine her inclusion as a member of the family; and (4) level of humanisation understood from a two-dimensional model: according to the similarity between species and the balance between the needs of humans and non-human animals.These findings provide new perspectives on multispecies families and highlight unresolved dilemmas in dominant social discourses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Arenas
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-025-00504-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Relationships Within Multispecies Families: Analysing Dilemmas on Humanisation of the Bond

Alicia Español, Javier López-Cepero Borrego
2 citations
Human Arenas
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
article

Negotiating Relationships Within Multispecies Families: Analysing Dilemmas on Humanisation of the Bond

Alicia Español, Javier López-Cepero Borrego
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The literature indicates that companions are frequently considered part of our families.But, what does it mean?This article examines how the relationship between humans and nonhuman animals is defined within the family organization.We organized three online focus groups interviews, and the analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis.The relationships with animals seemed to be based on four themes: (1) external limits (legal, moral, and biological) that frame the human-animal relationship; (2) participants' perception of their role within the relationship (e.g.caregivers); (3) characteristics perceived in the animal that determine her inclusion as a member of the family; and (4) level of humanisation understood from a two-dimensional model: according to the similarity between species and the balance between the needs of humans and non-human animals.These findings provide new perspectives on multispecies families and highlight unresolved dilemmas in dominant social discourses.

Human Arenas
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Universidad de Sevilla
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.