Systematic Literature Review: Validity And Reliability Testing Of Lecturer Performance Measurement Tools

The assessment of lecturer performance is a crucial element in efforts to improve the quality of higher education. Therefore, the development of valid and reliable measurement tools is essential to objectively evaluate lecturer performance. This study aims to conduct a review of the validity and reliability of lecturer performance measurement tools used in previous studies. The method employed in this research is a systematic literature review (SLR), by collecting, analyzing, and synthesizing findings from various relevant articles concerning the validity and reliability testing of lecturer performance instruments. The articles used are research studies that assess lecturer performance tools across various dimensions, including teaching, research, community service, and professional development. The findings indicate that the measurement tools possess good construct validity, with significant indicators and loading values above 0.5, as well as adequate reliability with composite reliability (CR) values above 0.7. This study confirms that the tested lecturer performance instruments are valid and reliable, and thus can be used as accurate and consistent evaluation tools in the context of higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Fokus Manajemen
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37676/jfm.v5i2.8429
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Literature Review: Validity And Reliability Testing Of Lecturer Performance Measurement Tools

Sandra Adetya, Yomima Viena Yuliana
1 links
Jurnal Fokus Manajemen
Online and Blended Learning
article

Systematic Literature Review: Validity And Reliability Testing Of Lecturer Performance Measurement Tools

Sandra Adetya, Yomima Viena Yuliana
article en

Abstract

The assessment of lecturer performance is a crucial element in efforts to improve the quality of higher education. Therefore, the development of valid and reliable measurement tools is essential to objectively evaluate lecturer performance. This study aims to conduct a review of the validity and reliability of lecturer performance measurement tools used in previous studies. The method employed in this research is a systematic literature review (SLR), by collecting, analyzing, and synthesizing findings from various relevant articles concerning the validity and reliability testing of lecturer performance instruments. The articles used are research studies that assess lecturer performance tools across various dimensions, including teaching, research, community service, and professional development. The findings indicate that the measurement tools possess good construct validity, with significant indicators and loading values above 0.5, as well as adequate reliability with composite reliability (CR) values above 0.7. This study confirms that the tested lecturer performance instruments are valid and reliable, and thus can be used as accurate and consistent evaluation tools in the context of higher education.

Jurnal Fokus ManajemenVol. 5(2)
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Systematic Literature Review: Validity And Reliability Testing Of Lecturer Performance Measurement Tools — Sandra Adetya, Yomima Viena Yuliana · Jurnal Fokus Manajemen (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS