The process of increasing the EU dependence on the security guarantees of NATO (1999-2004)

The article aims to demonstrate that, with the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty, the EU expressed a clear intention and aspiration to build its geopolitical ambition. This ambition positioned the EU to develop a security and defense policy and make it operationally capable. The article traces the evolution of the CSDP EU, following its development toward operational capability, up to the accession of CEE countries to the EU. In this way, the EU managed to threaten the dominance of NATO's security guarantees, which until then were exclusive and unquestionable. The practical establishment of the CSDP culminated in April 2003 at the Summit of France, Germany, Belgium, and Luxembourg, where the creation of an EU military planning headquarters for European autonomous action was agreed upon. The argument of the founding states of the EU is emphasized: that first it is necessary to have a stronger and more unified Europe in defense within NATO, as a prerequisite for greater military and economic participation of Europe in NATO. The article highlights a paradox: by achieving operational capability of the CSDP, the EU, in practice, increased rather than reduced its reliance on NATO's security guarantees, which was initially one of its primary objectives. It can be concluded that the 1999 NATO bombing of the FRY shows that strategic decisions are more influenced by events than by "theoretical commitments." NATO's expansion towards CEE countries exposed divisions within the EU. While the EU contributes economically to these states, the same cannot be said for security, leading to long-lasting stagnation in EU integration in the area of security and defense, a situation which is still ongoing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bastina
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/bastina35-53966
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The process of increasing the EU dependence on the security guarantees of NATO (1999-2004)

Damjan Ćuprić
Bastina
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

The process of increasing the EU dependence on the security guarantees of NATO (1999-2004)

Damjan Ćuprić
article en

Abstract

The article aims to demonstrate that, with the adoption of the Maastricht Treaty, the EU expressed a clear intention and aspiration to build its geopolitical ambition. This ambition positioned the EU to develop a security and defense policy and make it operationally capable. The article traces the evolution of the CSDP EU, following its development toward operational capability, up to the accession of CEE countries to the EU. In this way, the EU managed to threaten the dominance of NATO's security guarantees, which until then were exclusive and unquestionable. The practical establishment of the CSDP culminated in April 2003 at the Summit of France, Germany, Belgium, and Luxembourg, where the creation of an EU military planning headquarters for European autonomous action was agreed upon. The argument of the founding states of the EU is emphasized: that first it is necessary to have a stronger and more unified Europe in defense within NATO, as a prerequisite for greater military and economic participation of Europe in NATO. The article highlights a paradox: by achieving operational capability of the CSDP, the EU, in practice, increased rather than reduced its reliance on NATO's security guarantees, which was initially one of its primary objectives. It can be concluded that the 1999 NATO bombing of the FRY shows that strategic decisions are more influenced by events than by "theoretical commitments." NATO's expansion towards CEE countries exposed divisions within the EU. While the EU contributes economically to these states, the same cannot be said for security, leading to long-lasting stagnation in EU integration in the area of security and defense, a situation which is still ongoing.

Bastina(65)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.