Artificial intelligence in construction risk management: a decade of developments, challenges, and integration pathways

The increasing complexity and uncertainty of construction projects have driven a paradigm shift in risk management, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerging as a transformative tool. This systematic review examines 87 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024, assessing the role of AI technologies—including machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), knowledge-based reasoning (KBR), optimisation algorithms (OAs), and computer vision (CV)—across the construction risk management lifecycle. Using PRISMA guidelines and NVivo-based mixed-method analysis, the review identifies AI’s core functions in risk identification, assessment, response, and monitoring, while uncovering key barriers such as fragmented implementation, limited adaptability, and socio-organisational resistance. ML and CV dominate predictive and visual analysis, while NLP and KBR support compliance and rule-based decision-making; OAs optimise resource trade-offs. Despite increasing research, critical gaps persist, including fragmented AI integration, limited attention to implementation barriers, and underrepresentation of adaptive response and monitoring stages. This paper makes four specific contributions: (1) it offers a functional taxonomy that maps AI methods to distinct risk management tasks and phases; (2) it synthesizes technical, organisational, and ethical challenges hindering real-world AI adoption; (3) it introduces an integrated AI–risk management lifecycle framework that aligns AI capabilities with construction project needs; and (4) it extends classical risk epistemologies by embedding Beck’s, Power’s, and Aven’s perspectives into the discourse on AI governance. These contributions provide a structured foundation for advancing research and guiding practitioners toward responsible, resilient, and explainable AI deployment in high-stakes construction environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2512080
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in construction risk management: a decade of developments, challenges, and integration pathways

Matthew Moorhead, Kun Tian, Zicheng Zhu, Jasper Mbachu et al.
5 citations
Journal of Risk Research
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.70
article

Artificial intelligence in construction risk management: a decade of developments, challenges, and integration pathways

Matthew Moorhead, Kun Tian, Zicheng Zhu, Jasper Mbachu, Amir Naser Ghanbaripour
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The increasing complexity and uncertainty of construction projects have driven a paradigm shift in risk management, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerging as a transformative tool. This systematic review examines 87 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024, assessing the role of AI technologies—including machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), knowledge-based reasoning (KBR), optimisation algorithms (OAs), and computer vision (CV)—across the construction risk management lifecycle. Using PRISMA guidelines and NVivo-based mixed-method analysis, the review identifies AI’s core functions in risk identification, assessment, response, and monitoring, while uncovering key barriers such as fragmented implementation, limited adaptability, and socio-organisational resistance. ML and CV dominate predictive and visual analysis, while NLP and KBR support compliance and rule-based decision-making; OAs optimise resource trade-offs. Despite increasing research, critical gaps persist, including fragmented AI integration, limited attention to implementation barriers, and underrepresentation of adaptive response and monitoring stages. This paper makes four specific contributions: (1) it offers a functional taxonomy that maps AI methods to distinct risk management tasks and phases; (2) it synthesizes technical, organisational, and ethical challenges hindering real-world AI adoption; (3) it introduces an integrated AI–risk management lifecycle framework that aligns AI capabilities with construction project needs; and (4) it extends classical risk epistemologies by embedding Beck’s, Power’s, and Aven’s perspectives into the discourse on AI governance. These contributions provide a structured foundation for advancing research and guiding practitioners toward responsible, resilient, and explainable AI deployment in high-stakes construction environments.

Journal of Risk ResearchVol. 28(9-10)
Bond University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
7.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.