Predication of Preeclampsia Severity by NLR and PLR

Background & Objective: We aimed to assess the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in pregnant women with Severe Preeclampsia (SPE) compared with Non-Severe Preeclampsia (NSPE) and Non Preeclamptic (NPE) controls to evaluate whether there is an association between these hematologic parameters and severity of preeclampsia (PE). Methods: Demographic data and laboratory results of 148 pregnant women (age range:15-43 years; mean age:30 years), with SPE, NSPE and NPE were retrospectively evaluated in this cohort study during 2019-2021. Three groups were evaluated in terms of demographic characteristics and the hematological parameters of first trimester including Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Platelet, NLR and PLR. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was also performed to identify the optimal levels of NLR and PLR to predict PE. Results: In the present study, of 148 pregnant women, 47(31.7%) were SPE, 46(~31.1%) were NSPE and the remaining 55 (~37.2%) were NPE. According to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, variables don’t have normal distribution between groups (p<0.05). According to the Kruskal-Wallis Test, there was not a statistically significant difference between NLR and PLR in these three groups (p<0.05); however, the median of PLR in SPE group was higher than the two other groups. In the hematological parameters after Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis, NLR (p=0.000, β=-0.405) and PLR (p=0.001, β=15.5) levels in the SPE group were higher than the NSPE group. Also NLR (p=0.000, β=0.529) and PLR (p=0.000, β=-39.03) levels in the SPE group were higher than the control group. In the ROC analysis, for both NLR and PLR, the area under the curve was <0.07. The cut-off values of NLR>2.13 and PLR>81 predicted PE between NSPE and NPE groups with the sensitivity of 73% and 60% and specificity of 43% and 48% respectively. The cut-off values of NLR>2.03 and PLR>85 predicted PE between SPE and NSPE groups with the sensitivity of 70% and 60% and the specificity of 27% and 46.7% respectively. Conclusion: NLR and PLR cannot be used as a marker. in predicting of subsequent PE or its severity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i27s.6520
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predication of Preeclampsia Severity by NLR and PLR

Fatemeh Hosseinzadeh, Hamid Amini, Sedighe Bab Eghbal, Seyed Mohammad Asgari Galebin et al.
2 citations
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Machine Learning and ELM
4.96
article

Predication of Preeclampsia Severity by NLR and PLR

Fatemeh Hosseinzadeh, Hamid Amini, Sedighe Bab Eghbal, Seyed Mohammad Asgari Galebin, Mandana Mansour Ghanaie, Somayeh Ahmadi Gorji, Seyedeh shahed Shoarishoar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background & Objective: We aimed to assess the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in pregnant women with Severe Preeclampsia (SPE) compared with Non-Severe Preeclampsia (NSPE) and Non Preeclamptic (NPE) controls to evaluate whether there is an association between these hematologic parameters and severity of preeclampsia (PE). Methods: Demographic data and laboratory results of 148 pregnant women (age range:15-43 years; mean age:30 years), with SPE, NSPE and NPE were retrospectively evaluated in this cohort study during 2019-2021. Three groups were evaluated in terms of demographic characteristics and the hematological parameters of first trimester including Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, Platelet, NLR and PLR. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was also performed to identify the optimal levels of NLR and PLR to predict PE. Results: In the present study, of 148 pregnant women, 47(31.7%) were SPE, 46(~31.1%) were NSPE and the remaining 55 (~37.2%) were NPE. According to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, variables don’t have normal distribution between groups (p<0.05). According to the Kruskal-Wallis Test, there was not a statistically significant difference between NLR and PLR in these three groups (p<0.05); however, the median of PLR in SPE group was higher than the two other groups. In the hematological parameters after Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) analysis, NLR (p=0.000, β=-0.405) and PLR (p=0.001, β=15.5) levels in the SPE group were higher than the NSPE group. Also NLR (p=0.000, β=0.529) and PLR (p=0.000, β=-39.03) levels in the SPE group were higher than the control group. In the ROC analysis, for both NLR and PLR, the area under the curve was <0.07. The cut-off values of NLR>2.13 and PLR>81 predicted PE between NSPE and NPE groups with the sensitivity of 73% and 60% and specificity of 43% and 48% respectively. The cut-off values of NLR>2.03 and PLR>85 predicted PE between SPE and NSPE groups with the sensitivity of 70% and 60% and the specificity of 27% and 46.7% respectively. Conclusion: NLR and PLR cannot be used as a marker. in predicting of subsequent PE or its severity.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(27S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Machine Learning and ELM
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.