Evaluation of the Rapid Molecular Diagnostic based Pneumonia Plus Panel for the Identification of Bacteria and Modification of Antibiotics in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at a Tertiary Centre

INTRODUCTION: Inability to identify the microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection leads to unnecessary antibiotic use.(1) We evaluated the utility of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BioFire PN) to modify antibiotics in 80 patients admitted to Aster medcity ICU for a period of 1 year OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish the usefulness of the PCR pneumonia panel to detect bacterial agents in lower respiratory tract specimens in a prospective study in hospitalised ICU patients with the primary objective being modification of antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre, open-label, pragmatic, prospective randomized control study with ICU patients admitted in Aster medcity for 1 year. RESULTS: Among the endotracheal aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens obtained from 80 adult patients, The Biofire PN turnaround time (TAT) was earlier and modification of antibiotics were made accordingly as per the resistance gene panel. Median TAT was shorter for the biofire PN, compared with culture technique (2.6 vs 57.5 h, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR pneumonia panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Biofire PN offers a rapid and sensitive diagnostic method for lower respiratory tract infections. It helped in modification of antibiotic usage. Efficient fast tool in identifying bacteria responsible for pneumonia. It can be used as an adjunct tool for pulmonary bacterial infection diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship.(2) However, clinical correlation is advised to determine its significance in interpreting multiple pathogens and detection of genes involved in antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jaypee-journals-10071-24933.97
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Rapid Molecular Diagnostic based Pneumonia Plus Panel for the Identification of Bacteria and Modification of Antibiotics in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at a Tertiary Centre

Anuroop Balagopal, Rachel A. James
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Evaluation of the Rapid Molecular Diagnostic based Pneumonia Plus Panel for the Identification of Bacteria and Modification of Antibiotics in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at a Tertiary Centre

Anuroop Balagopal, Rachel A. James
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inability to identify the microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection leads to unnecessary antibiotic use.(1) We evaluated the utility of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BioFire PN) to modify antibiotics in 80 patients admitted to Aster medcity ICU for a period of 1 year OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish the usefulness of the PCR pneumonia panel to detect bacterial agents in lower respiratory tract specimens in a prospective study in hospitalised ICU patients with the primary objective being modification of antibiotics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre, open-label, pragmatic, prospective randomized control study with ICU patients admitted in Aster medcity for 1 year. RESULTS: Among the endotracheal aspirates and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens obtained from 80 adult patients, The Biofire PN turnaround time (TAT) was earlier and modification of antibiotics were made accordingly as per the resistance gene panel. Median TAT was shorter for the biofire PN, compared with culture technique (2.6 vs 57.5 h, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR pneumonia panel for bacterial detection were 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8% to 97.8%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 91.1% to 95.3%) respectively. For detecting antibiotic resistance, the positive- and negative percent agreement were 100% (95% CI, 81.5% to 100.0%) and 98.5% (95% CI, 216 96.7% to 99.4%) respectively. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Biofire PN offers a rapid and sensitive diagnostic method for lower respiratory tract infections. It helped in modification of antibiotic usage. Efficient fast tool in identifying bacteria responsible for pneumonia. It can be used as an adjunct tool for pulmonary bacterial infection diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship.(2) However, clinical correlation is advised to determine its significance in interpreting multiple pathogens and detection of genes involved in antimicrobial resistance.

Indian Journal of Critical Care MedicineVol. 29(S1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of the Rapid Molecular Diagnostic based Pneumonia Plus Panel for the Identification of Bacteria and Modification of Antibiotics in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections at a Tertiary Centre — Anuroop Balagopal, Rachel A. James · Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS