Fe, Cu and S isotopes as tracers of microbial reduction in the shale-hosted VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt

This study represents an exploration of the geochemistry of sulphide minerals from prominent shale-hosted volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, including Sotiel-Migollas, Tharsis, Neves Corvo and Lousal using the non-traditional heavy stable isotopes of Fe and Cu along with the S light isotope. Sampling encompassed a diverse range of styles of mineralization, including the dominant fine-grained massive sulphides sometimes exhibiting sedimentary layering, carbonate-rich mounds dominated by sulphides-siderite and formed by the superposition of microbial mats in anoxic bottoms, underlying subseafloor feeder structures (stockworks) and disseminated pyrite within the altered host shales. The δ 56 Fe IRMM-014 values of pyrite exhibit a range from −2.62 to +2.58 ‰, while those of pyrrhotite range from −1.93 to −0.40 ‰. Chalcopyrite δ 65 Cu SRM-976 signature varies between −1.11 and + 0.95 ‰, while the measured δ 34 S V-CDT values fluctuate from −45.0 to +9.4 ‰ in pyrite, −6.8 to +2.1 ‰ in pyrrhotite, and − 10.1 to +6.2 ‰ in chalcopyrite. Notably, pyrite grains within massive sulphides consistently exhibit more negative and variable δ 56 Fe and δ 34 S values than those in the hydrothermally altered host shales (apart from Neves Corvo) and stockworks. These findings strongly imply that the exhalative mineralization incorporated substantial amounts of iron derived from the dissimilatory reduction of aqueous Fe +3 , attributable to low-temperature (<100–120 °C) microbial reduction and contemporaneous with biogenic sulphate reduction. Consequently, Fe in pyrite is likely inherited from both the reduced hydrothermal fluids venting on the seafloor and the microbial reduction of oxidized iron dissolved in ambient seawater. While the microbial influence on Cu isotope signatures is less evident, we infer its potential significance. Superimposed hydrothermal refining during the late percolation of hot hydrothermal fluids reveals a non-biogenic kinetic fractionation, with partial overprinting of the early mineralization and neoformation of sulphides depicting isotopically heavy δ 56 Fe, δ 65 Cu, and δ 34 S signatures that are interpreted as of deep derivation. • Fe, Cu and S stable isotopes applied to giant Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB). • Detailed study of isotopic compositions of different minerals and pyrite textures. • Fe in pyrite from the IPB is inherited from hydrothermal fluids and microbial reduced iron. • Superimposed hydrothermal refining partially overprints δ 56 Fe, δ 65 Cu, and δ 34 S signatures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107819
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fe, Cu and S isotopes as tracers of microbial reduction in the shale-hosted VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt

S. García de Madinabeitia, José Ignacio Gil Ibarguchi, Graham D. Layne, J. Velasco-Acebes et al.
Journal of Geochemical Exploration
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Fe, Cu and S isotopes as tracers of microbial reduction in the shale-hosted VMS deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt

S. García de Madinabeitia, José Ignacio Gil Ibarguchi, Graham D. Layne, J. Velasco-Acebes, Fernando Tornos, Yann Lahaye, Ferenc Molnár
article en

Abstract

This study represents an exploration of the geochemistry of sulphide minerals from prominent shale-hosted volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits of the Iberian Pyrite Belt, including Sotiel-Migollas, Tharsis, Neves Corvo and Lousal using the non-traditional heavy stable isotopes of Fe and Cu along with the S light isotope. Sampling encompassed a diverse range of styles of mineralization, including the dominant fine-grained massive sulphides sometimes exhibiting sedimentary layering, carbonate-rich mounds dominated by sulphides-siderite and formed by the superposition of microbial mats in anoxic bottoms, underlying subseafloor feeder structures (stockworks) and disseminated pyrite within the altered host shales. The δ 56 Fe IRMM-014 values of pyrite exhibit a range from −2.62 to +2.58 ‰, while those of pyrrhotite range from −1.93 to −0.40 ‰. Chalcopyrite δ 65 Cu SRM-976 signature varies between −1.11 and + 0.95 ‰, while the measured δ 34 S V-CDT values fluctuate from −45.0 to +9.4 ‰ in pyrite, −6.8 to +2.1 ‰ in pyrrhotite, and − 10.1 to +6.2 ‰ in chalcopyrite. Notably, pyrite grains within massive sulphides consistently exhibit more negative and variable δ 56 Fe and δ 34 S values than those in the hydrothermally altered host shales (apart from Neves Corvo) and stockworks. These findings strongly imply that the exhalative mineralization incorporated substantial amounts of iron derived from the dissimilatory reduction of aqueous Fe +3 , attributable to low-temperature (<100–120 °C) microbial reduction and contemporaneous with biogenic sulphate reduction. Consequently, Fe in pyrite is likely inherited from both the reduced hydrothermal fluids venting on the seafloor and the microbial reduction of oxidized iron dissolved in ambient seawater. While the microbial influence on Cu isotope signatures is less evident, we infer its potential significance. Superimposed hydrothermal refining during the late percolation of hot hydrothermal fluids reveals a non-biogenic kinetic fractionation, with partial overprinting of the early mineralization and neoformation of sulphides depicting isotopically heavy δ 56 Fe, δ 65 Cu, and δ 34 S signatures that are interpreted as of deep derivation. • Fe, Cu and S stable isotopes applied to giant Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB). • Detailed study of isotopic compositions of different minerals and pyrite textures. • Fe in pyrite from the IPB is inherited from hydrothermal fluids and microbial reduced iron. • Superimposed hydrothermal refining partially overprints δ 56 Fe, δ 65 Cu, and δ 34 S signatures.

Journal of Geochemical ExplorationVol. 277
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Geological Survey of Finland (FI), University of the Basque Country (ES), Centro de Astrobiología (ES), Instituto de Geociencias (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.