Vascular Plant Traits Shape Biocrust Community Structure in a Diverse Arid Shrubland

ABSTRACT Question Vascular plants and biocrusts are the main ground cover in drylands. Interaction between these components regulates a wide range of ecosystem functions. However, little is known about biocrusts associated with different vascular plant species, and understanding the interactions between them remains a challenge. We ask: Is biocrust community structure predicted by vascular plant species? Which vascular plant traits influence biocrust community structure and help to explain biocrust‐plant interactions? Does the interaction between biocrusts and vascular plants vary across landforms? Location Arid shrubland in Patagonia, Argentina. Methods We measured the composition and cover of biocrusts growing in open interspaces and beneath different vascular plant species, and quantified canopy and root traits of the eight most abundant vascular plant species in two different landforms. We explored the specificity of biocrust‐plant interactions by evaluating differences in biocrust structure in relation to multiple vascular plant traits. Results Biocrust cover was higher beneath vascular plant canopies than in open interspaces and increased with vegetation cover at the landscape scale. Different vascular plant species hosted different biocrust assemblages, which were partially explained by plant canopy architecture traits. However, relevant vascular plant traits differed in relation to biocrust composition or total cover. Whereas loose, large, and inverted cone‐shaped canopies provided a canopy service for the development of biocrust cover, vascular plant height was strongly correlated to a gradient in biocrust composition from ruderal to slow‐colonizer species. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that vascular plants greatly contribute to increasing biocrust heterogeneity, evidencing that biocrust‐plant interaction should be accounted for in the assessment of dryland ecology and management. In addition, our results suggest trait‐specificity of vascular plant‐biocrust interactions, so that further field vascular plant trait‐based studies have the potential to contribute to the search for general patterns of biocrust‐plant interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vegetation Science
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.70041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vascular Plant Traits Shape Biocrust Community Structure in a Diverse Arid Shrubland

Adela Bernardis, Maximiliano J. Bustos, Agustina C. Cottet, Irene A. Garibotti et al.
1 citations
Journal of Vegetation Science
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
3.03
article

Vascular Plant Traits Shape Biocrust Community Structure in a Diverse Arid Shrubland

Adela Bernardis, Maximiliano J. Bustos, Agustina C. Cottet, Irene A. Garibotti, Mariana Tadey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Question Vascular plants and biocrusts are the main ground cover in drylands. Interaction between these components regulates a wide range of ecosystem functions. However, little is known about biocrusts associated with different vascular plant species, and understanding the interactions between them remains a challenge. We ask: Is biocrust community structure predicted by vascular plant species? Which vascular plant traits influence biocrust community structure and help to explain biocrust‐plant interactions? Does the interaction between biocrusts and vascular plants vary across landforms? Location Arid shrubland in Patagonia, Argentina. Methods We measured the composition and cover of biocrusts growing in open interspaces and beneath different vascular plant species, and quantified canopy and root traits of the eight most abundant vascular plant species in two different landforms. We explored the specificity of biocrust‐plant interactions by evaluating differences in biocrust structure in relation to multiple vascular plant traits. Results Biocrust cover was higher beneath vascular plant canopies than in open interspaces and increased with vegetation cover at the landscape scale. Different vascular plant species hosted different biocrust assemblages, which were partially explained by plant canopy architecture traits. However, relevant vascular plant traits differed in relation to biocrust composition or total cover. Whereas loose, large, and inverted cone‐shaped canopies provided a canopy service for the development of biocrust cover, vascular plant height was strongly correlated to a gradient in biocrust composition from ruderal to slow‐colonizer species. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that vascular plants greatly contribute to increasing biocrust heterogeneity, evidencing that biocrust‐plant interaction should be accounted for in the assessment of dryland ecology and management. In addition, our results suggest trait‐specificity of vascular plant‐biocrust interactions, so that further field vascular plant trait‐based studies have the potential to contribute to the search for general patterns of biocrust‐plant interactions.

Journal of Vegetation ScienceVol. 36(3)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad Nacional del Comahue (AR)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.