Experiential Learning Strategy: Its Effect on Science Performance of Grade VI Pupils at Ripang Elementary School

This study aimed to determine the effect of the Experiential Learning Strategy (ELS) on the science performance of Grade 6 pupils at Ripang Elementary School during the School Year 2024–2025. Grounded in the K to 12 learner-centered and inquiry-based science curricula, the study addressed the ongoing challenge of poor science achievement among Filipino students, as reflected in the 2022 PISA results. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the pre-test performance in science of the control and experimental groups before the implementation of ELS? (2) What is the post-test performance of these groups after the intervention? (3) Is there a significant difference in post-test performance between the groups when gender is considered? Three null hypotheses were tested: (1) There is no significant difference in the pre-test performance between groups; (2) There is no significant difference in the post-test performance between the groups; and (3) There is no significant difference in the post-test performance when analyzed by gender. The study employed a two-group pre-test and post-test experimental design. The participants were 26 Grade 6 pupils, divided equally into control and experimental groups through total enumeration. The control group received traditional instruction, while the experimental group was taught using ELS. A standardized 40-item multiple-choice test, aligned with PROJECT SMART for Science 6, was used to measure performance before and after the intervention. The results revealed that both groups performed poorly in the pre-test. However, in the post-test, the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean score (M=32, "Good") compared to the control group (M=30, "Fair"). A t-test showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group (p = 0.040), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. Gender-based analysis showed that ELS improved science performance for both male and female students, suggesting no gender bias in its effectiveness. In conclusion, the Experiential Learning Strategy significantly enhanced the science performance of Grade 6 pupils at Ripang Elementary School. It promoted active engagement, deeper understanding, and equitable academic outcomes. It is therefore recommended that science teachers integrate experiential learning approaches in their instruction to foster more meaningful, inclusive, and effective learning experiences in science education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2025/v38i41397
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiential Learning Strategy: Its Effect on Science Performance of Grade VI Pupils at Ripang Elementary School

Kaycee T. Lagua
Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science
Educational Methods and Outcomes
article

Experiential Learning Strategy: Its Effect on Science Performance of Grade VI Pupils at Ripang Elementary School

Kaycee T. Lagua
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the Experiential Learning Strategy (ELS) on the science performance of Grade 6 pupils at Ripang Elementary School during the School Year 2024–2025. Grounded in the K to 12 learner-centered and inquiry-based science curricula, the study addressed the ongoing challenge of poor science achievement among Filipino students, as reflected in the 2022 PISA results. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the pre-test performance in science of the control and experimental groups before the implementation of ELS? (2) What is the post-test performance of these groups after the intervention? (3) Is there a significant difference in post-test performance between the groups when gender is considered? Three null hypotheses were tested: (1) There is no significant difference in the pre-test performance between groups; (2) There is no significant difference in the post-test performance between the groups; and (3) There is no significant difference in the post-test performance when analyzed by gender. The study employed a two-group pre-test and post-test experimental design. The participants were 26 Grade 6 pupils, divided equally into control and experimental groups through total enumeration. The control group received traditional instruction, while the experimental group was taught using ELS. A standardized 40-item multiple-choice test, aligned with PROJECT SMART for Science 6, was used to measure performance before and after the intervention. The results revealed that both groups performed poorly in the pre-test. However, in the post-test, the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean score (M=32, "Good") compared to the control group (M=30, "Fair"). A t-test showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group (p = 0.040), leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis. Gender-based analysis showed that ELS improved science performance for both male and female students, suggesting no gender bias in its effectiveness. In conclusion, the Experiential Learning Strategy significantly enhanced the science performance of Grade 6 pupils at Ripang Elementary School. It promoted active engagement, deeper understanding, and equitable academic outcomes. It is therefore recommended that science teachers integrate experiential learning approaches in their instruction to foster more meaningful, inclusive, and effective learning experiences in science education.

Journal of Education Society and Behavioural ScienceVol. 38(4)
Malayan Colleges Laguna (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Educational Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.